The forms of Government in china differ from the forms of government in costa rica because Chinese political system is authoritarian while the one in Costa Rica is a democratic republic.
<h3>How did the forms of
Government in china differ from the
forms of government in costa rica?</h3>
Costa Rica can be described as a country that practice a democratic republic which has a very strong system of constitutional checks and balances.
Chinese political system on the other hand is authoritarian , which made it to be differnt.
It should be noted that Authoritarianism which is the form of government that is been adopted by the Chinese is been described as the rejection of political plurality.
It should be noted that this involves the use of strong central power , and this is to be able to preserve the political status quo in the system.
It involves the reductions as regards the rule of law as well as separation of powers and this is not inline with the democratic voting.
Learn more about Government at:
brainly.com/question/18464634
#SPJ1
<span>National convention.....
</span>
Answer: umm you don’t have any pictures or questions
Explanation:
Answer:
Irrespective of its genuine strategic objectives or its complex historical consequences, the campaign in Palestine during the first world war was seen by the British government as an invaluable exercise in propaganda. Keen to capitalize on the romantic appeal of victory in the Holy Land, British propagandists repeatedly alluded to Richard Coeur de Lion's failure to win Jerusalem, thus generating the widely disseminated image of the 1917-18 Palestine campaign as the 'Last' or the 'New' Crusade. This representation, in turn, with its anti-Moslem overtones, introduced complicated problems for the British propaganda apparatus, to the point (demonstrated here through an array of official documentation, press accounts and popular works) of becoming enmeshed in a hopeless web of contradictory directives. This article argues that the ambiguity underlying the representation of the Palestine campaign in British wartime propaganda was not a coincidence, but rather an inevitable result of the complex, often incompatible, historical and religious images associated with this particular front. By exploring the cultural currency of the Crusading motif and its multiple significations, the article suggests that the almost instinctive evocation of the Crusade in this context exposed inherent faultlines and tensions which normally remained obscured within the self-assured ethos of imperial order. This applied not only to the relationship between Britain and its Moslem subjects abroad, but also to rifts within metropolitan British society, where the resonance of the Crusading theme depended on class position, thus vitiating its projected propagandistic effects even among the British soldiers themselves.
Explanation:
Answer:
World War I offered the Young Turk dictatorship (Committee on Union and Progress; CUP) an opportunity to realize its nationalist aims. Already inclined toward Germany due to economic ties, close relations between the two militaries, and compatible territorial ambitions for a war against Russia, the Young Turk government concluded a secret military agreement with the German government on August 2, 1914, and formally entered the war on the side of the Central Powers on November 11.
Explanation:(some major points of it)
Armenians in Conflict Zones
Forced Labor and Massacres on the Front
Aftermath of World War I
