Answer:
With this question, you need to see which side of the argument you support. Do you believe they should've gone to war or not?
Why?
I said I didn't support it because we solved the problem in a less destructive manner.
Explanation:
Just fill in the blanks with your opinion and facts to support your opinion.
Nobody can really tell you how to feel or answer these.
It's up to you and your opinion!
"Like other settled, agrarian societies in history, those in the Indian subcontinent have been attacked by nomadic tribes throughout its long history. In evaluating the impact of Islam on the sub-continent, one must note that the northwestern sub-continent was a frequent target of tribes raiding from Central Asia. In that sense, the Muslim intrusions and later Muslim invasions were not dissimilar to those of the earlier invasions during the 1st millennium."
<span>Richard M. Frye, "Pre-Islamic and Early Islamic Cultures in Central Asia", in </span>Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective<span>, ed. Robert L. Canfield (Cambridge U. Press c. 1991), 35–53.</span>"
So, MUSLIMS is the answer, does it have this option?
That depends. Who's asking?
Http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/gulf/sa-forrel-iraq.htm
Check here lol
