Why did Mr. de Leeuw’s plan to go to Switzerland fail? with textual evidence

English

1 answer:

Nina [5.8K]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Switzerland maintained a state of armed neutrality during the first world war. However, with two of the Central Powers (Germany and Austria-Hungary) and two of the Entente Powers (France and Italy) all sharing borders and populations with Switzerland, neutrality proved difficult. Under the Schlieffen Plan, the German General Staff had been open to the possibility of trying to outflank the French fortifications by marching through Switzerland in violation of its neutrality, although the plan's eventual executor Helmuth von Moltke the Younger selected Belgium instead due to Switzerland's mountainous topography and the disorganized state of the Belgian Armed Forces.[1] From December 1914 until the spring of 1918, Swiss troops were deployed in the Jura along the French border over concern that the trench war might spill into Switzerland. Of lesser concern was the Italian border, but troops were also stationed in the Unterengadin region of Graubünden

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Is the following sentence true or false?

Delicious77 [7]

I believe the answer is true

4 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Read the excerpt from Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass.

Ronch [10]

Answer:

The crouching servility, usually so acceptable a quality in a slave, did not answer when manifested toward her.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Brainliest if correct please answer

Maslowich

Answer:

B. Record quotations from the text in a journal or diary.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which is greater 1/5 or 1/9

Kamila [148]

Well, this is an easy trick. The smaller denominator means a bigger amount.
Or, you could turn them both into 45ths.
1 x9 = 9
5 x9 = 45

1 x5 = 5
9 x5 = 45

5 has a smaller denominator, and it is greater.

1/5 is greater.
Hope this helps!

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Read the passage. The cost of health care is rising in America. The amount that an average family must pay for insurance is simp

kaheart [24]

The correct answer is A. The writer uses an appeal to emotion by portraying her family as abandoned by policymakers.

Explanation:

In the text, the writer supports the idea cost of health care is too high by mentioning the situation of her family, about this, she mentions policymakers do not consider "hardworking people like my husband and me". This detail would likely trigger emotions in the audience and convince them it is true health care is too hight and policymakers are not considering the situation of citizens. However, this is not a valid argument but a fallacy because the author does not use real evidence such as statistics to explain her point of view. According to this, the evidence is a fallacy because "The writer uses an appeal to emotion by portraying her family as abandoned by policymakers."

6 0

3 years ago