The colonists<span> were angry about the </span>Sugar Act<span> largely due to the economic consequences. This </span>act<span> added a tax of three cents on refined </span>sugar<span>. It also increased import taxes on non-British coffee, certain wines, textiles and indigo dye, and it banned French wine and foreign rum importation.</span>
Yes.
I would concur that the breakdown of the multi-polar distribution of power between 1914-1945 was more or less unavoidable and unpreventable. To conclude what was going on, we need to look back to the 19th century. Most of the 19th-century events, from the end of the Napoleonic Wars in 1815, Great Britain was considered as the world’s incontrovertible superpower. Britain had the largest, most powerful and strong navy in the world. It was the incontrovertible and undisputed ruler of the seas.
The people on the political left unhappy with the new deal because they thought it wasn't convincing enough to do good for the company.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The new deal was a FDR's policy to deal with great depression. The FDR's polices helped many people as it created job opportunities and the first to benefit from it was the farms which were saved from foreclosure with the help of the legislature of FDR.
Franklin D. Roosevelt produced an alliance that incorporated the Democratic state party associations, city machines, worker's organizations, hands-on laborers, minorities (racial, ethnic, and strict), ranchers, white Southerners, individuals on help, and intelligent people.
Answer:
PLEASE TRANSLATE
Explanation:
TRANSLATE TO ENGLISH or FRENCH
No, because there would not have been a larger rush to finish the project
