Mr. Grave wanted the other members of the donner party to eat the flesh of his body once he died, so they could live. They were put into horrible conditions and their supplies were already run out weeks ago. To the group of pioneers it seemed that there was nothing to do for living but kannibalism, so they ate fleshes of the dead. Therefore, Mr. Grave was ready to make such a sacrifice, hoping that he can save lives.
It is advised that you sit no to a lesser extent than ten inches from the airbag. For surety rationalities and to forefend trauma or uttermost injuries.
The statement stating to know the opinions of the others in the group contributes to the cooperative group discussion. Thus, option D is correct.
The question is incomplete as the missing options are:
A. You are dead wrong. What you are saying sounds absolutely crazy.
B. Let’s have a vote on whose point is correct.
C. I cannot stand your know-it-all attitude on this topic.
D. I’d like to know how everyone else in the group feels about it.
<h3>What are cooperative discussions?</h3>
Cooperative group discussions are conferences and talks that involve two or more people in the group. They involve the discussion to be from the perspective of every participant.
In the last option, the discussion is open to everyone as they can discuss the topic freely unlike the other options that are one-sided and do not involve the free stating of the views individually.
Therefore, option D. the views of every person in the group is an example of cooperative group discussion.
Learn more about cooperative group discussion here:
brainly.com/question/11083376
#SPJ1
Answer:
Appeal to authority
Explanation:
A logical fallacy is a flaw in reasoning.
The type of a logical fallacy found in the given passage is called the appeal to authority (or argumentum ad verecundiam). It occurs when a person claims that something is true (or untrue) simply because a valid authority or expert on the issue said so.
Here, the authority in question is a highly respected local doctor. According to the speaker, we should agree with him only because he is one of the smartest and most prominent citizens. There are no legitimate arguments in favor of the mentioned candidate for mayor.
