Place too much power in the hands of a single ruler
Answer: The Prince (Italian: Il Principe [il ˈprintʃipe], Latin: De Principatibus) is a 16th-century political treatise written by the Italian diplomat and political theorist Niccolò Machiavelli as an instruction guide for new princes and royals. The general theme of The Prince is of accepting that the aims of princes – such as glory and survival – can justify the use of immoral means to achieve those ends.[1]
From Machiavelli's correspondence, a version appears to have been distributed in 1513, using a Latin title, De Principatibus (Of Principalities).[2] However, the printed version was not published until 1532, five years after Machiavelli's death. This was carried out with the permission of the Medici pope Clement VII, but "long before then, in fact since the first appearance of The Prince in manuscript, controversy had swirled about his writings".[3]
Although The Prince was written as if it were a traditional work in the mirrors for princes style, it is generally agreed that it was especially innovative. This is partly because it was written in the vernacular Italian rather than Latin, a practice that had become increasingly popular since the publication of Dante's Divine Comedy and other works of Renaissance literature.[4][5]
The Prince is sometimes claimed to be one of the first works of modern philosophy, especially modern political philosophy, in which the "effectual" truth is taken to be more important than any abstract ideal. It is also notable for being in direct conflict with the dominant Catholic and scholastic doctrines of the time, particularly those concerning politics and ethics.[6][7]
Although it is relatively short, the treatise is the most remembered of Machiavelli's works and the one most responsible for bringing the word Machiavellian into usage as a pejorative. It even contributed to the modern negative connotations of the words politics and politician in Western countries.[8] In subject matter it overlaps with the much longer Discourses on Livy, which was written a few years later. In its use of near-contemporary Italians as examples of people who perpetrated criminal deeds for politics, another lesser-known work by Machiavelli which The Prince has been compared to is the Life of Castruccio Castracani.
Answer:
d. his negotiations were always backed by the threat of military force.
Explanation:
What was the Big Stick Policy? It is the name often referred to as US foreign policy under Theodore Roosevelt (1901-1909). Roosevelt acted to maintain a friendly and cordial air in the negotiations, while at the same time making clear the possibility of using force to overwhelm his opponents and achieve his intent. The president would also create the Roosevelt Corollary, in which he supported the Monroe Doctrine (marked by the phrase “America for Americans”) and sought to extend it from a viewpoint that favored the United States. To this end, it has transformed the Americas into an exclusively American sphere of influence, especially the Central American area.
C.
The document is advertising that slaves will be sold.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
You're throwing your money away by paying extra interest each. By paying the minimum it will take you longer to pay off while paying more interest
