Is the interstate commerce act a valid example of pure socialism?
No it is not. The reason it's not is this is that Socialism has to do with ownership of the means of production and distribution, which means how the surplus value generated by the means of production is used.
the Interstate Commerce act has nothing to do with socialism.
It is an example of government interventionism in a market-based economy. It did not attempt to change the method of ownership and allocation of surplus value in the railroad industry, nor did it attempt to introduce worker self-management.
The great famine of 1845–1851 devastated the population of the country Ireland. It was an era of mass disease, starvation and emigration in the country of Ireland. The main cause of the famine was the potato blight which destroyed potato crops everywhere in Europe which hit Ireland the most since most of the residents were dependent on the potato crops.
They were because of Civil Disobedience, a belief followed by the liked of Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. that basically means that unjust laws are unworthy of being followed.
Answer:
Explanation:
The National Socialist Party is what they started out as but they ended up in a dictatorship instead.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
The Mongol conquest of the Abbasid Caliphate culminated in the horrific sack of Baghdad that effectively ended the Islamic Golden Age. The Islamic Golden Age—from the 8th to the mid-13th century—was one of the greatest periods of human flourishment in knowledge and progress, with Baghdad as its focal point.
Give me brainlest when somebody else answers!!!!
