Answer:
It hurt the confederacy very harshly, by destroying many crop fields, taking control of a vast amount of previously controlled confederate land, and scaring many confederate supporters off.
Explanation:
Sherman led a march of about 60,000 soldiers from Atlanta to Savanna, Georgia.
The intention was mainly to scare any remaining confederate supporters off. Anyone who opposed had their possessions taken and their property burned. They did not destroy whole towns but they destroyed many crop fields, resulting in reduced rations for soldiers and less food for the families at home.
They also ended up capturing Atlanta, which at the time was a main railroad hub in the south, and also home to the ICOTC or the industrial center of the confederacy. It held many supplies for all of the armies in the deep south.
<span>The flow of the water slows as the river reaches the ocean. As a result, much of the sediment the river is carried is deposited, forming a delta.</span>
Answer: Locke and Rousseau would be most likely to support a <u>change of government brought about by the people</u>.
You might say this means they would support a <u>revolution</u> by the people against a bad government ... and to an extent that is true. We might want to be cautious, however, in ascribing too much revolutionary fervor to either of those two philosophers. Both of them were writing philosophy about how the people should be the sovereign power in a state -- that a government gets its power from the people and needs to serve the interests of the people. So in theory, they support the people's right to remove a government that has become tyrannical and replace it with a government that works properly on behalf of the people. But neither Locke nor Rousseau was personally advocating violent revolution. American colonists took up arms against Britain in response to their sort of philosophy (especially Locke's). And the bourgeoisie in France started the movement that became the French Revolution based on thoughts in both Lock and Rousseau. But as Enlightenment thinkers, both men ideally hoped to convince others by means of their arguments that a constitutional form of government was the best idea (Locke), or even that direct democracy was the right way for a state to operate (Rousseau).
