<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
Amount realized 22,000 Minus: Basis 89,000 Loss recognized 67000
<u>answer a </u>) Since Karen is single she can guarantee this lose as a common misfortune to a limit of $50,000. Karen won't have the option to guarantee the whole $67,000 that she lost she can just guarantee $50,000.
<u>answer b) </u>Since Karen is recording a joint government form she can guarantee a lose of upto $100,000. Karen will have the option to guarantee the whole loss of $67,000.
<u>answer c )</u> With the stock being bought from another investor as opposed to the sorting out enterprise she can guarantee the whole loss of $67,000 as a captial gain misfortune.
<u>answer d )</u> B. By selling a segment of the stock in one year and the staying stock in one more year Karen could change over the whole misfortune on the deal to a normal misfortune.
I would say that an intrinsic risk factor would be like poor balance which can happen as a person ages, plus loss of muscle tone and these two things together, coupled with an extrinsic factor like outside uneven ground can contribute to a fall and perhaps broken bones as bones can get more brittle with age too.
<span>This is the right answer: c. no, because of nafta, you would expect the export of goods to canada and mexico to be substantial.
</span>
The employer would be depositing your check into your account
