The answer that is not true is A: "Scott could only sue in state courts."
Whether Dred Scott, as a slave, had any legal right to sue in court was a matter that applied whether talking about state or federal courts. When Scott's suit was rejected by a state of Missouri court, Scott and his supporters managed to bring the case into a federal court, and it went all the way to the Supreme Court. Though the Supreme Court at the time ruled that Scott had no right to bring the suit because he was a slave and not a citizen (point D above), the case gave Chief Justice Roger Taney opportunity to make further statements regarding the slavery issue, including points B and C in your list above.
No, as much as they wanted to stay neutral, they had no choice. They had to pick a side to be on
Guilds were a medieval association of craftsmen or merchants who control the practice of their craft in a particular town or village.
Answer: It called for a confederacy of the Southern states.
Explanation:
Following the 1869 election, where Abraham Lincon won, a state convention was held in South Carolina, where they established their secession from the United States and declared themselves a free nation. This was due to disputes over the legality of slavery between the northern states and the southern states.
After enacting various laws and establishing their constitution as an independent nation, they offered various southern states to unite into a confederation to fight the northern states.
<em />
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
