It's first you claim, then you come with details. So, it's the starting point for any argument.
message me ill help you out , i know this stuff really really well , just text me ill help you b..
The article provides three causes of the decline in the number of children being born.
The first cause is the reduction of mortality. If fewer children die at their youngest age, parents naturally don't need to have more babies so that more of them would survive. Also, there isn't an emotional need to "fill the void" after the death of an infant. This is the so-called risk and mortality factor.
The second cause of fertility decline is the so-called economic-and-investment model, which means how wealthy the families are, and how capable they are of distributing resources among their children. For example, owing or not owing farmland was proved to be one of the very important factors in predicting the fertility rates in a society.
The third cause is the cultural transmission, that is, the transmission of the cultural model of small families with fewer children. This transmission happens via education. However, this conclusion is not enough; education is a bridge between the cultural transmission and economic-and-investment model, as it leads to better social and financial status.
Uhhhhh, wow. I'm surprised that you havent figured this out. Unless you aint in the USA then i'd understand. BUT SERIOUSLY, C'MON. Here's the answer:
They put up a memorial to show respect to the soildeirs who died for our country protecting its rights, and from being taken from us and made a communistic country.
It is A word with an Opposite meaning
