All categories

2 years ago

Help me please again lol

Mathematics

1 answer:

olasank [31]2 years ago

3 0

<h3>✎ Answer:</h3>

Option B is your answer

✄--------------

$Min=2$

$Q1=4$

$Median=6$

$Q3=8$

$Maximum=11$

<h3>❆❆❆❆❆❆❆❆❆❆❆</h3><h3>hope it helps..</h3><h3>have a great day!!</h3>

You might be interested in

ashley spends $12 to buy 3 pencils and 6 rulers. Jack spends $8 to buy 5 pencils and 2 rulers. what is the cost of 2 pencils and

Sveta_85 [38]

Answer:

$ 3 left ashley money

$ 1 left jacks money

$ 8 left ashley money

$ 4 left jacks money

Step-by-step explanation

3 pencils + 6 rulers = 12 - 9 = 3

5 pencils + 2 rulers = 8 - 7 = 1

12 - 4 = 8

8 - 4 = 4

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following is the measure of ZAXY if ray x bisects ZAXB,

weqwewe [10]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

bisect means to cut in half so it is half of 110 so it is 55

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Let X1,X2......X7 denote a random sample from a population having mean μ and variance σ. Consider the following estimators of μ:

Viefleur [7K]

Answer:

a) In order to check if an estimator is unbiased we need to check this condition:

$E(\theta) = \mu$

And we can find the expected value of each estimator like this:

$E(\theta_1 ) = \frac{1}{7} E(X_1 +X_2 +... +X_7) = \frac{1}{7} [E(X_1) +E(X_2) +....+E(X_7)]= \frac{1}{7} 7\mu= \mu$

So then we conclude that $\theta_1$ is unbiased.

For the second estimator we have this:

$E(\theta_2) = \frac{1}{2} [2E(X_1) -E(X_3) +E(X_5)]=\frac{1}{2} [2\mu -\mu +\mu] = \frac{1}{2} [2\mu]= \mu$

And then we conclude that $\theta_2$ is unbiaed too.

b) For this case first we need to find the variance of each estimator:

$Var(\theta_1) = \frac{1}{49} (Var(X_1) +...+Var(X_7))= \frac{1}{49} (7\sigma^2) = \frac{\sigma^2}{7}$

And for the second estimator we have this:

$Var(\theta_2) = \frac{1}{4} (4\sigma^2 -\sigma^2 +\sigma^2)= \frac{1}{4} (4\sigma^2)= \sigma^2$

And the relative efficiency is given by:

$RE= \frac{Var(\theta_1)}{Var(\theta_2)}=\frac{\frac{\sigma^2}{7}}{\sigma^2}= \frac{1}{7}$

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we assume that we have a random sample given by: $X_1, X_2,....,X_7$ and each $X_i \sim N (\mu, \sigma)$

Part a

In order to check if an estimator is unbiased we need to check this condition:

$E(\theta) = \mu$

And we can find the expected value of each estimator like this:

$E(\theta_1 ) = \frac{1}{7} E(X_1 +X_2 +... +X_7) = \frac{1}{7} [E(X_1) +E(X_2) +....+E(X_7)]= \frac{1}{7} 7\mu= \mu$

So then we conclude that $\theta_1$ is unbiased.

For the second estimator we have this:

$E(\theta_2) = \frac{1}{2} [2E(X_1) -E(X_3) +E(X_5)]=\frac{1}{2} [2\mu -\mu +\mu] = \frac{1}{2} [2\mu]= \mu$

And then we conclude that $\theta_2$ is unbiaed too.

Part b

For this case first we need to find the variance of each estimator:

$Var(\theta_1) = \frac{1}{49} (Var(X_1) +...+Var(X_7))= \frac{1}{49} (7\sigma^2) = \frac{\sigma^2}{7}$

And for the second estimator we have this:

$Var(\theta_2) = \frac{1}{4} (4\sigma^2 -\sigma^2 +\sigma^2)= \frac{1}{4} (4\sigma^2)= \sigma^2$

And the relative efficiency is given by:

$RE= \frac{Var(\theta_1)}{Var(\theta_2)}=\frac{\frac{\sigma^2}{7}}{\sigma^2}= \frac{1}{7}$

5 0

3 years ago

Help help help help help help help

Aloiza [94]

Add the exponents so 3^3 or 27

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the answer to 1 / 3 - 1 / 6

DochEvi [55]

1/6 because 1/3 is 2/6

7 0

3 years ago