Answer:
$1,305,600
Explanation:
Date of acquisition = Jan, 1 2016
Cost of purchase = $1,904,000
Initial useful life - 15 years
Initial amortization - 1904000/14
= $126,933
Date of review of amortization policy -2019
Accumulated amortization before 2019 -126,933.33*3=380800
Remaining useful years at December 2019 7
Amortization in 2019 =1904000-380800/7 =217,600
Carrying value at December 2019 = 1904000 - (380800 +217600) =1305600 Please note that change in amortization policy can only be applied progressively and not retrospectively
Answer:
The two questions that he must ask from himself are:
- Do you have credit report?
- Do you have good credit score?
Explanation:
The reason is that the banks are giving you money and are worried about whether or not you are going to pay them back or not. So they require some evidences whether the person has any credit report and good credit score which shows that the person will be worried to pay the bank and if he is not able to pay he find alternative as he is a responsible person. So these two questions assesses whether the person is capable to pay the mortgage.
Answer:
Option (B) 5.5%
Explanation:
Data provided in the question :
Factor Risk premium
Factor 1 5%
Factor 2 3%
Beta of stock A on factor 1 = 1.4
Beta of stock A on factor 2 = 0.5
Expected return = 14%
Now,
Expected return
= Risk free rate + (Beta of factor 1 × Risk premium of factor 1) + (Beta of factor 2 × Risk premium of factor 2)
or
14% = Risk free rate + (1.4 × 5%) + (0.5 × 3%)
or
14% = Risk free rate + ( 7% + 1.5% )
or
Risk free rate = 5.5%
Hence,
Option (B) 5.5%
Answer:
Who is the franchisor? McDonald's
Who is the franchisee? C.B. Management Inc.
In a franchise relationship, the <u>franchisee</u> is economically dependent on the <u>franchisor's</u> business system.
The franchise relationship is defined by the <u>contract</u>.
Did C.B. Management, Inc.’s failure to make a payment due more than thirty days earlier constitute a breach of the franchise contract? YES
Why? A) the contract provided McDonald's could terminate the contract when a payment was more than 30 days late.
Did the contract provide that the acceptance of a late payment waived McDonald's right to terminate for late payments? NO
What does an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing require? That the parties act <u>reasonably</u>.
Did McDonald's act of accepting late payments in the past transform McDonald's right to terminate into a discretionary decision governed by the standard of good faith and fair dealing in the future? NO
Why? Which one of these reasons is not correct? B) the actions of the parties control this issue.
A court would likely find for <u>McDonald’s</u>
Answer:
OA
Explanation:
kalasksksksksjdjdkdjdjdjkdjfnfnfgmgmg
