China 100 years ago was conflicting with what was being taught. The Qing Dynasty was strict on what was being taught, and set it up to where you were learning what they viewed as being acceptable.
The philosophies of Mahatma Gandhi and that of the founding
fathers of UAE are alike. Some of the Founding Fathers of UAE are “Sheikh
Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, Previous Ruler of Abu Dhabi and Founding President
of the UAE (1918–2004)”; “Sheikh Rashid bin Saeed Al Maktoum
Former Ruler of Dubai (1912–1990)”; “Sheikh Khalid bin
Mohammed Al Qasimi, Former Ruler of Sharjah, (1931-1972).”
They all thought in interrelating with the shared man to
build the nation. They all governed with kindness and desire. They organized
the wealth for the benefit of nation. Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan
was known as “the Father of the Nation for his role in forming the United Arab
Emirates.”
Jacques is most likely experiencing the<u> </u><u>identity-versus-role-confusion </u>crisis. Thus, the correct word to fill the sentence is<u> identity-versus-role-confusion.</u>
<h3>What do you by identity-versus-role-confusion crisis?</h3>
Identity versus confusion is the 5th level of ego in psychologist Erik Erikson's idea of psychosocial development. This level takes place in the course of formative years between the ages of about 12 and 18.
In this stage, teens discover their independence and broaden their experience of self.
Thus, the correct statement is <u>identity</u><u>-versus</u><u>-role-confusion</u><u>.</u>
<u />
Learn more about identity versus confusion here:
brainly.com/question/27276486
#SPJ1
<u></u>
Answer:
Ring v Arizona (2002)
Explanation:
On June 24, 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Ring v. Arizona, ending the practice of having a judge, rather than a jury, decide the critical sentencing issues in a death penalty case. It is unclear, however, if the ruling will apply to all the defendants in all states with judge sentencing.
Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, was a case in which the United States Supreme Court applied the rule of Apprendi v. New Jersey, to capital sentencing schemes, holding that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury to find the aggravating factors necessary for imposing the death penalty.
Answer:
this is the final answer i couldn't show the work sorry 4.78078