Answer:
Así, al final, el emperador romano, con su guardia y su casa, gobernando un imperio explotado para llenar su tesoro, era esencialmente indistinguible de esos jefes bárbaros con los que chocaba.
Los romanos siempre habían despreciado a los "bárbaros" y creían que las tierras de los bárbaros (como Escocia y Alemania) eran en gran medida inadecuadas para la civilización, por ser demasiado frías y húmedas para el tipo de agricultura mediterránea a la que estaban acostumbrados los romanos.
The correct answer is <span>Cyrus the Great
He managed to conquer all the city states and turn them into a great empire. The empire would last for long because of its dynastic rule. This is the famous Persian empire that waged war against Greeks later and even against Alexander.</span>
What question are you speaking of?
I believe the answer is: A-he disagreed with slavery but supported compromise
Daniel Webster was known as the leading supporter for Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 that required federal officials to capture and punish slaves that were running away. Because of this Webster was viciously attacked by the abolitionist because he agreed to the compromise rather than fully eliminated slavery.
