When a party purchases an app from the author, the copyright transfers from the author to the buyer. What is this is called

Whispering Winds Corp. has the following transactions during August of the current year. Aug. 1 Issues shares of common stock to

k0ka [10]

Answer:

Aug. 1 Issues shares of common stock to investors in exchange for $10,800.

Accounting equation:

Asset + 10,800

Equity +10,800

Journal entry:

cash 18,000 debit

common stock 18,000 credit

Aug. 4 Pays insurance in advance for 3 months, $1,200.

Accounting equation:

Asset + 1,200

Assets - 1,200

Net 0

Journal entry:

prepaid rent 1,200 debit

cash 1,200 credit

Aug. 16 Receives $730 from clients for services rendered.

Accounting equation:

Asset + 730

Equity +730

Journal entry:

cash 730 debit

revenues 730 credit

Aug. 27 Pays the secretary $580 salary

Accounting equation:

Asset - 580

Equity - 580

Journal entry:

salaries expense 580 debit

cash 580 credit

Explanation:

We need to disclose how the impact in the accounting equation and the journal entry should be done:

Aug 1st the common stock is an equity account that is increasing

we receive cash that is an asset

August 4th we are using our cash to pay in advance the rent.

this gives a right to use the rental space for 3-months thus, it is not an expense is a new asset. There is no change in the accounting equation only the composition of assets changed.

August 16th we recognize earnings through revenues account this increases the equity of the company as well as assets.

August 27th in this case we pay the salaries which are an incurred cost, therefore, expense. This decreases equity.

We also use cash making assets to decrease as well.

6 0

3 years ago

As marleen got out of her car in the parking lot of her local grocery store, a homeless woman approached her and asked for money

TiliK225 [7]

Th e answer is esketiiit

6 0

3 years ago

Farrokh and Scheherezade Sharabianlou agreed to buy a building owned by Berenstein Associates for $2 million. They deposited $11

s2008m [1.1K]

Answer:

This was an actual court case that ended in the Court of Appeals of the First District of California. Initially a lower court had ruled against the Sharabianlous and set extremely high compensations for damages to Berenstein. I do not understand why the court did it since it was proven that the land was contaminated and couldn't be sold under unless cleaned.

Finally, the court of appeals ruled in favor of the Sharabianlous, not because they thought they were right, but due to errors in the original trial.

The big issue in this case was that the contract signed by the Sharabianlous wasn't clear enough about what would happen if the land was not suitable for sale and they also failed to seek a lawyer when the contamination issues became obvious. If you read the case, even the real estate broker acted against the Sharabianlous when the property was appraised since he didn't tell the appraiser about the contamination issues.

The final ruling was made in 2010, 8 years after the parties engaged in the transaction, which gives us an idea of how complicated things can get when legal procedures are not followed, even though the outcome should be obvious.

If I was part of a jury and the case was about property that couldn't be sold due to contamination, I would probably vote in favor of the buyer, not the seller. It's common sense, but sometimes it you do not follow the appropriate legal path, common sense makes no sense at all.

6 0

3 years ago

The merger of McKesson, the leading U.S. drug wholesaler, and HBOC, a producer of health-care inventory software, is an example

Elis [28]

The merger is an example of

<h3>What is a vertical merger?</h3>

A merger occurs when one firm is absorbed by another firm. When a merger occurs, one of the firms would not exist as a separate entity while the other firm would continue to exist.

A vertical merger is when a firm purchases another firm in the same production line. e.g. a baker purchases a pastry distributing company.

To learn more about mergers, please check: brainly.com/question/1086715

5 0

2 years ago

Jorge purchased a copyright for use in his business in the current year. The purchase occurred on July 15th and the purchase pri

jolli1 [7]

Answer:

$6,000

Explanation:

Purchase price = $75,000

Remaining life = 75 months

The amortization amount for each month (Am) is given by the total purchase price divided by the remaining life of the copyright.

$A_m=\frac{\$75,000}{75}=\$1,000\ per\ month\\$

Since the purchase was made in July, there are 6 months left in the current year. Therefore, Jorge's total amortization amount during the current year is:

$A=6*\$1,000 = \$6,000$

7 0

3 years ago