The speakers of "auspex" and "a psalm of life" are similar as both think about some sort of loss and they both love terribly and sincerely.
<h3>The similarity between speakers of "auspex" and "a psalm of life"</h3>
- The stages of a cognitive process are displayed.
- The poems discuss the meaning of life and how to deal with grief and difficulties encountered along the path.
- It starts with the speaker disagreeing with a listener who wants to give him a mathematical explanation of life.
- The poems are renowned for their upbeat tone and realistic outlook on life. The poet makes it clear that happiness or suffering is not the point of existence.
Hence, the speakers of "auspex" and "a psalm of life" are comparable since they both lament a loss and express a great and honest affection.
To learn more about "auspex" and "a psalm of life" refers to:
brainly.com/question/12792362
#SPJ10
Answer:
Sigo aqui a pesar de lo malo
De ese oscuro pasado
Siempre estoy junto a ti
Sigo aqui abrazado a lo nuestro
A este amor tan inmenso
Que no sabe morir
He llorado tanto mas
Que el cielo
Lagrimas de dolor
He tocado fondo tantas veces
luchando por tu amor
Soy incondicional
Un amor tan real que
No juzga que suena
Que sufre y perdona
Un amor de verdad
Soy Incondicional
Un amor tan real
Que no espera
Algo a cambio
Que no tiene horario
Un amor de verdad
NNNnno no no
Descubri
Que un amor verdadero
Se entrega por completo
Y eso hice por ti..
He llorado tanto mas
Que el cielo
Lagrimas de dolor
He tocado fondo tantas veces
luchando por tu amor
(coro)
Soy incondicional
Un amor tan real que
No…
Explanation:
What is right for me may well be wrong from someone else’s perspective. So all the answers to this question are right and wrong, probably both at the same time.
If ever, I need to make that decision, I would say that well, it depends on who the other people are. Knowing the background and history of the person for whom I am supposed to sacrifice myself if of utmost importance in this case. The question becomes infinitely interesting if the history of the other persons is not available.
If the history of other persons is available, and if its me against a bunch of criminals who have committed horrors, then definitely a BIG NO. If it’s against someone who is a much better person according to my ethical standards, then he/she deserves to live a little longer than me.
If the history of other persons is not available, then it depends on the state of mind I’m in. If I’ve been suffering from depression, and I’m not able to see any silver lining for a long time, and life itself has lost meaning to me then I will want to restart my life. In that situation, Death may seem like a good idea to make a restart.
There are just, too many “ifs” to this question. No one can say what exactly they will actually do, until they are in the situation themselves.
Marcus’ current stage of identify development may be classified as identity diffusion. He has yet to choose a choice to be against them yet. He doesn’t agree with their actions and he doesn’t affirm to either side of the issue at hand.
Though, I would say Moratorium if he is “presently” in a crisis regarding a certain decision. However, I’m not sure how he’s trying different alternatives from this point onwards.
Answer:
He means that your own conscience must tell you what is right or wrong, and it does not matter how many others agree or disagree with you. As Atticus explains to Scout, this is why he is defending Tom Robinson, even though most of the town thinks he is wrong for doing it
