Answer:
The correct answer is Supply Chain
Explanation:
TT toys have recently started buying paint from a Chinese company to complete the final product. The Chinese company is part of the supply chain because it is helping TT toys to complete the final product. The Chinese company is providing a resource, and any operation which acts as a source, resource, or information to complete a product is a part of a supply chain management.
Investing <span>is riskier but has the potential for a higher rate of return</span>
Answer:
B) $1,132,895
Explanation:
If the CPI = 15.2 in 1931, and in 2012 it was = 229.6, then President Hoover was making a fortune = (229.6 / 15.2) x $75,000 = $1,132,895, and he was a terrible president, one of the worst ones in all history.
In 2012 when President Obama was in office, he made around $400,000 and he was a much better president.
According to classical macroeconomic theory and monetary neutrality, changes in the money supply affect the GDP deflator
A measure of inflation in the prices of goods and services produced in the United States, including exports. The GDP deflator, though calculated differently, reflects the GDP price index very well. The GDP deflator is used by some companies to adjust payments for contracts.
GDP deflator = nominal GDP / real GDP * 100
Other price indexes such as CPI and GDP deflators are not formed in fixed baskets of goods and services. The basket changes each year depending on the investment and consumption patterns of the people of the year.
The GDP deflator is an essential indicator of the economy and helps to compare the year-to-year rise in price levels of goods and services. Unlike the Consumer Price Index (CPI), the GDP deflator allows comparisons across multiple time periods without using the base year as a constant or specific commodity basket.
Learn more about GDP deflator here: brainly.com/question/25084407
#SPJ4
Answer:
Please check the answer below
Explanation:
a. One issue is the "locking-in" of assets. If I hold shares of Corporation X, then I can delay paying taxes as long as I don't sell. Effectively, I get to keep all of the interest/dividend payments on my tax liability. However, if I discover that X is really a poor investment and Corporation Y is better, then selling X and buying Y means that I have to pay taxes. This might discourage me from making a switch to a more profitable/efficient investment decision. This is the "locking-in" effect.
b. A short-run cut might cause many people to sell stocks that they had felt "locked-in" with. The penalty for switching is smaller, so more people will do it -- resulting in a great deal of cap gains tax revenue collected.
c. Taxing realized gains, even when the stock is not sold, rather than just accrued gains would eliminate this locking-in effect. Investors would not be penalized for switching to a better investment, and long-term capital gains revenue (as well as efficiency) would rise.
