This was an example of Transcendentalism.
I hope this helps!
In the review, the writer keep using the word 'we' such in : "we doubt Mrs. stowe would recognize the cogency of this argument"
Answer:
a Loyalist are those who support the British crown
Answer:
D. A citizen of another country who is visiting the United States on vacation
Explanation: they are obviously a citizen of another country and not Americans. They are just on a visit not permanently staying. you still consider all the other as citizens.
A- There is a law in United State that said a child born on United States land atomically is American Citizen
B- That person who was born on American soil and now overseas can choose whether or not to change his/her citizenship or to keep it.
C- That person is an American and something else. He is both. That doesnt make him non American. Just mean he is both.
Few people doubted his legitimacy. Legitimacy in this issue isn't characterized by the mainstream vote, vote tallies, our outrage or individuals quibbling about how the procedure turned out badly. It's characterized by a legitimate procedure that — regardless of the possibility that we contend about regardless of whether the Supreme Court settled on the morally remedy choice—was lawful and inside their domain. He promised of office, the Congress and Executive branch perceived that and hence he was the true blue POTUS. Suppositions on this issue are as unessential as sentiments on the presence of gravity.
