A long carbon and hydrogen chain and a carboxyl group.
In images of fatty acids (the monomers of Lipids), it is depicted as a long carbon chain with hydrogen on the ends and connected to them as well, yet on the clear side is the carboxyl group.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
1. Parasitism
2. Mutualism
3. Competition
4. Commensalism
Explanation:
The given are all different ecological relationships. These relationships how the members of the ecosystem interact with each other.
Parasitism is a relationship where one organism is harmed and the other one benefits. However, parasitism is specifically referring to a relationship where one lives inside the other organism, causing it harm by directly feeding off them or depriving it from getting nutrients.
Mutualism is a relationship were both organisms benefit from the relationship. In the example, the aphids provide protection for the ants while the ants provide food to the aphids (honey dew). Another example of a mutualistic relationship would be the tickbird and the rhino. The rhino benefits because the tickbird eats the ticks of the rhino, and in return, the tickbird is fed.
Competition is a relationship between organisms that compete for resources. In the case of your question the two grasses are competing against each other for the nutrients and water. Animals also share this type of relationship, especially when those that prey on the same animals for food.
Commensalism is a relationship between organisms where one benefits and the other does not benefit, but is NOT harmed. A good example would be the remora and sharks. Remoras are fish that swim with sharks. They swim beneath the sharks fins. The sharks provides them protection from other predators and remoras benefit because they get to eat scraps of the sharks food as well.
Answer:
The water has a dipole that causes it to act like a magnet, attracting other water molecules to it. Adhesion is the attractive forces that cause water to "stick" to a surface other than its own. ... The salt water has a much lower cohesion than plain water so it's attractive forces are less than plain water.
The answer is C because there is no inference in the statement like the others.
Answer:
i think less is more
Explanation:
let me explain so i think less would be better because then you wound have as many people that are homeless or refugees we all wish refugees could find safe homes but for all of them that just isn't possible.Then again i don't think that you should resort to genocide when trying to maintain a smaller population.Though one could argue the opposite.
(you can come to your own conclusion this is just my opinion)
