Answer:
Cheryl represents childhood innocence.
or
the children are interested in grandpa
Explanation:
Hope it helped!!
Are you kidding me bro? Keiko is a person, therefore, the answer is C. Tulips are the flowers, not referring to “she.” The sentence is saying that Keiko is raising tulips because Keiko enjoys flowers.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
because I think it is because I just took the test
One
As discussed, this one needs background
Two
Amy Tan speaks lovingly and with great understanding about her mother's English and how they (mother and daughter) communicate differently when alone, and Amy Tan would say when she is with others who speak formally.
I don't know if you have what Tan said next. It is a great pity if you don't. It is one of the most beautifully written praises that a child can give to a parent: it is the recognition of the child that no matter how broken her mother's English, she knew things that were far more important than grammar and syntax. I'm sorry I digress.
The answer you want is three, backed up by 4, but the real answer is the aqua colored sentence. Tan is admitting that though her mother was in the room, she (Amy) was using stilted formal language which she realized her mother would never understand, and for herself it sounded phony. She wanted, it is implied, to be speaking in language that her mother could understand.
1. summarize the plot briefly (the readers of the critique need to know what the story is about)
2. briefly give author's background (it may have an effect on the story)
3. give strengths and weaknesses (you need to show both the good and the bad parts)
4. point out examples of style (style is also very important in stories)
5. identify characters (you are going to critique their portrayal anyways)
6. make the conflict clear
7. recommend to certain type of reader (so that other readers know this isn't something they'd like)
