Answer:
A careful rereading of this excerpt would help a reader understand the "League" mentioned in the first sentence because:
C. The reader could make the connection between the “League” and the third sentence, which explains that they “organized strikes in the garment trade.”
Explanation:
According to the third line of the excerpt, the League had organized strikes in the garment trade. This same League, according to the first and second lines, had organized a new event and was surprised at the turnout of so many people now - so many that the speakers uses the word "army" to help readers visualize it. From that, we can infer that the League refers to a group of people who helped coordinate and organize protests and sit-ins in the pursuit of equality during the Civil Rights Movement.
Praise can create personal confidence in children and this encourages them to gain knowledge, be sure of their abilities, and have greater motivation and intelligence.
<h3>How does mindset influence communication and proactiveness?</h3>
- A person's mindset can help communicate and be proactive at school and at work when it's built in a positive way.
- This positive construction is done through praise, self-knowledge, and respect, which are capable of building good mental health for the individual.
A person's mentality represents the way that person sees himself in relation to the world around him. When this mentality is positively constructed, people become more aware of their capabilities and more motivated to overcome challenges, deal with frustrations and seek knowledge.
Therefore, we can confirm that mentality has a crucial role in the intellectual and functional development of individuals, being able to make them proactive and efficient.
Learn more about mental health at the link:
brainly.com/question/14777606
#SPJ1
Though Brutus’ speech was logical and concise and he thought that the crowd would rally to his cause, he failed to gain. Brutus was demanded the people to listen hear him. He tried to win the people over and support through logical explanations. He listed down the reasons for killing Caesar and was very concise in his speech as he believed the truth will convince the people and rally to his cause. The problem was the people didn’t connect with his arguments and he was too aloof in his approach that he failed to gain their support and he should make a speech wherein he had a personal connection with the crowd.Anthony on the other hand asked the people to hear him. His agreement of the senate’s actions was for the subtle purpose of discrediting all that they said. Listing down the achievements of Caesar, he was all manipulating the crowd by appealing to their emotion. As he made his speech, he was crying and this moved the crowd enabling him to win them over. Anthony was the better orator because of his use of emotion and facts.<span>
</span>