Answer:
No
Step-by-step explanation
Drawing quadrilateral ABCD (in picture), I tried to prove that the triangles ABD CDB were congruent, proving that the quadrilateral was a parallelogram, however, with the terms you just described, it is impossible prove that the triangles were congruent as SSA is not a valid congruence postulate. Therefore, ABCD does not have to be a parallelogram.
Answer:
£2,121.80
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve this problem, we can use the compound interest formula:
<em>P = initial balance</em>
<em>r = interest rate (decimal)</em>
<em>n = number of times compounded annually</em>
<em>t = time</em>
<em />
First, change 3% into a decimal:
3% -> -> 0.03
Now, plug in the values:
Your answer is £2,121.80