This literary device is an example of "foreshadowing" - an indication of how future events will be effected.
Answer:
Justices of the Supreme Court decide to hear certain appealed cases.
Explanation:
For the Supreme Court to consider a case at least four out of nine justices have to vote to grant a writ of certiorari which is a decision by the Supreme Court to hear an appeal from a lower court. Certiorari meaning to inform. In this context, a lower court is informed of the Supreme Court’s intention to review one of its decisions.
The fallacious arguments are:
The Civil War was about Northern businessman trying to bankrupt Southern farmers by emancipating their enslaving work force.
England developed a fair and just taxation system for the American Colonies.
<em>Both sentences have fallacious arguments.
</em>
A fallacy is a wrong idea or a belief that is not true. In the case of the question, the first sentence is a fallacy because the Civil War was not about that argument. The Union wanted to have abolishment ideas that were not supported by the Confederated States. In the case of the second sentence, that is also a fallacy. The taxation system imposed by the English was not fair. It was a heavy taxation system that upset the colonies and that was one of the reasons to start the American Revolution.
The first piece of evidence is the most effective and the fourth paragraph is the least effective