1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
navik [9.2K]
3 years ago
12

Pls help me! I’m stuck on this problem! I will give points to whoever make this clear! Thank you!

English
1 answer:
lions [1.4K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: he went through a lot (c)

Explanation: Conventional quantum field theories work well in describing the results of experiments at high-energy particle smashers such as CERN’s Large Hadron Collider, where the Higgs was discovered, which probe matter at its smallest scales. But if you want to understand how things work in many less esoteric situations – how electrons move or don’t move through a solid material and so make a material a metal, an insulator or a semiconductor, for example – things get even more complex.

The billions upon billions of interactions in these crowded environments require the development of “effective field theories” that gloss over some of the gory details. The difficulty in constructing such theories is why many important questions in solid-state physics remain unresolved – for instance why at low temperatures some materials are superconductors that allow current without electrical resistance, and why we can’t get this trick to work at room temperature.

But beneath all these practical problems lies a huge quantum mystery. At a basic level, quantum physics predicts very strange things about how matter works that are completely at odds with how things seem to work in the real world. Quantum particles can behave like particles, located in a single place; or they can act like waves, distributed all over space or in several places at once. How they appear seems to depend on how we choose to measure them, and before we measure they seem to have no definite properties at all – leading us to a fundamental conundrum about the nature of basic reality.

This fuzziness leads to apparent paradoxes such as Schrödinger’s cat, in which thanks to an uncertain quantum process a cat is left dead and alive at the same time. But that’s not all. Quantum particles also seem to be able to affect each other instantaneously even when they are far away from each other. This truly bamboozling phenomenon is known as entanglement, or, in a phrase coined by Einstein (a great critic of quantum theory), “spooky action at a distance”. Such quantum powers are completely foreign to us, yet are the basis of emerging technologies such as ultra-secure quantum cryptography and ultra-powerful quantum computing.

But as to what it all means, no one knows. Some people think we must just accept that quantum physics explains the material world in terms we find impossible to square with our experience in the larger, “classical” world. Others think there must be some better, more intuitive theory out there that we’ve yet to discover.

In all this, there are several elephants in the room. For a start, there’s a fourth fundamental force of nature that so far quantum theory has been unable to explain. Gravity remains the territory of Einstein’s general theory of relativity, a firmly non-quantum theory that doesn’t even involve particles. Intensive efforts over decades to bring gravity under the quantum umbrella and so explain all of fundamental physics within one “theory of everything” have come to nothing.

Meanwhile cosmological measurements indicate that over 95 per cent of the universe consists of dark matter and dark energy, stuffs for which we currently have no explanation within the standard model, and conundrums such as the extent of the role of quantum physics in the messy workings of life remain unexplained. The world is at some level quantum – but whether quantum physics is the last word about the world remains an open question.

Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/definition/quantum-physics/#ixzz6v8lQ13km

You might be interested in
The bold adjective describes which noun?
Elza [17]

Answer:

There is no adjective in bold, but the two adjectives present in the sentence are tiny and quiet. <u>Tiny describes the noun butterfly</u>, and <u>quiet describes the noun garden.</u>

Explanation:

An adjective is a word that can modify or give information about a noun, which are words that we use for objects, names, and abstract things.

In this sentence, there are two adjectives. The first one is tiny and is telling us a characteristic about the noun butterfly. In other words, it is describing the size of the insect. The second adjective present in the sentence is quiet. Quiet is modifying the noun garden. It is giving information about this place, the garden.

5 0
3 years ago
How does Tybalt know Romeo is at the party?
postnew [5]

Answer:

i think capulet points him out but i'm not really sure

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Match the definition to the word. 1. the act of calling a prisoner to court to answer an indictment parliament 2. a rank held by
shtirl [24]

Answer:

1. the act of calling a prisoner to court to answer an indictment - arraignment

2. a rank held by commissioned officers - lieutenant

3. worn out completely; very tired - exhausted

4. offering or providing help; functioning in a subsidiary capacity - auxiliary

5. a narrow strip of land connecting two larger masses of land - isthmus

6. the national legislature of various countries, often composed of the nobility, clergy, and commons - parliament

7. to invigorate, stimulate, elate - exhilarate

8. flowers picked and fastened together in a bunch - bouquet

4 0
3 years ago
It was great! I left a lot less questions blank than I did last time. <br><br> find error
aliina [53]

Answer:

<h2>It was great! I left <u>lesser</u> questions than I did last time.</h2>

Explanation:

The given sentence contains an error in using two self-contradictory words 'lot' and 'less' back to back which puzzles the meaning of the sentence and affects its readability as well. The sentence contains 'than' which denotes a comparison and it uses the positive word 'great.' Therefore, it will use 'less' in the comparative degree to keep the meaning of the sentence positive conveying that comparatively lesser questions were left unattempted this time. Thus, the comparative degree 'lesser' would be used to rectify the error and establish the comparison between the two ideas.

8 0
3 years ago
Is this sentence grammatically correct?
aev [14]

Answer: yes, I believe.

Explanation: does your teacher allow slang? homies is slang, I think. but everything is correct.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Based on your reading of the passage, which sentence best presents the writer’s viewpoint? A. Excessive television watching enco
    10·1 answer
  • Write a diary entry of family memory
    13·1 answer
  • What does the character do? in the text The Elevator
    6·1 answer
  • Helpppp meeee !!!!!!Write two to three sentences describing what Arnetta’s story shows about the setting and conflict of the sto
    10·2 answers
  • Please help me!!! Commonlit The Power Of "Like"​
    11·1 answer
  • Weiland, by Charles Brockden Brown is an example of a novel.
    11·2 answers
  • What freedom should be expanded around the world and why?
    15·2 answers
  • Why do you believe that the people of Sighet, including Eliezer’s family, do not believe that they are in danger.
    14·1 answer
  • What is the imagery in this stanza?
    6·1 answer
  • What are some differences between Vladimir Lenin's speech and the character Old Majors speech from Animal Farm?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!