Answer:
The just-world phenomenon.
Explanation:
In psychology, the just-world phenomenon refers to a fallacy where someone assumes that something that happened to somebody else (whether good or bad) happened because they deserved it. In other words, this view stems from a misconception that the world is fair or just, and that everybody is just getting what's coming to them. This just-world theory is often used to rationalize any kind of heinous acts, such as torture, murder, genocide, etc., essentially blaming the victim. In this case, the horrors of the Holocaust were rationalized by the German civilian as something that its victims deserved. In that person's mind, a punishment of such magnitude had to be proportional to the magnitude of the victims' crimes. This is an example of the just-world phenomenon.
Because they were fighting on their own territory and defending their home, the vietcong had greater determination than the US who were not really sure what they were there for.
The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 was passed in July of 1787.
This statement is technically valid in the sense that both the Federalist and Anti-Federalists believed in the future of the Union--it was just that they differed on how they thought the Union would progress.
The literature on the consequences of the Reformation shows a variety of short- and long-run effects, including Protestant-Catholic differences in human capital, economic development, competition in media markets, political economy, and anti-Semitism, among others.
