The first time Burr made Hamilton angry, according to americanhistory.com, was:
"The rivalry between Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr had its roots in a 1791 Senate race. Aaron Burr defeated Philip Schuyler who was Hamilton's father-in-law. Schuyler as a Federalist would have supported George Washington's<span>and Hamilton's policies while Burr as a Democratic-Republican opposed those policies."
I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
</span>
Answer:
Because the company promoted a biased description of virgins by establishing only the good points about it, while Smith and Frethorne's accounts were more realistic and impartial.
Explanation:
The company promoted a description where it only addressed the qualities of Vírginia. This was done to help settlers and show the state as a wonderful and flawless earth. In fact, Vírginia had advantages, but the description of the company was completely biased and incomplete in many factors. John Smith and Richard Frethorne, on the other hand, presented more complete reports, as they were indeed familiar with the territory. They presented a more impartial report, describing the state as it really was, without alleviating possible defects.
B.) <span>Hohenzollerns was the ruling family in Prussia
Hope this helps!</span>
1 million workers accounts for nearly 20 percents of all injuries and illnesses in the workplace
