In an organization with compensation that has <u>hybrid outcome interdependence</u>, a <u>given </u>portion of the employee's pay depends on the team's output and performance.
Hybrid outcome interdependence refers to the terms of employment in which a team’s output and performance determines a specified portion of the members’ salary. So, if their performance fails to meet given targets or standards, members will end up getting lower pay.
On the other hand, there are incentive structures linked to such arrangements, so that overachieving the targets would lead to members receiving a bonus.
Hybrid outcome interdependence is a key corporate strategy to ensure employees put in their best effort, as incentive and disincentive structures are built into the pay structure.
To learn more about hybrid outcome interdependence: brainly.com/question/28195254
#SPJ4
Answer:
1. Dividends = Dividends, it decreases stockholder's equity.
2. Rent Revenue = Revenue, it increases stockholder's equity
3. Advertising Expense = Expense, it decreases stockholder's equity
4. Stockholder's pay cash into business = Issuance of stock, increases stockholder's equity.
Explanation:
Notes to above:
1. Dividends are paid from current year income or from retained earnings, as both current year earnings and retained earnings are clubbed into equity thus, with payment of dividend, equity is decreased.
2. Rent revenue is a part of income and income is part of equity as with increase in income there is increase in equity also.
3. Advertising expense will decrease the income and with decrease in income there will be decrease in equity.
4. Stockholder's pay cash into business as for issuance of stock and with issue of stock equity will increase.
Based on the amount it would cost to build the machine and the interest rate as well as the payoff, the following are true:
a. The machine will take a year to build which means the payoff will only start coming in next year.
First find the present value of the perpetuity:
= 70 / 5%
= $1,400
You then need to find the present value of the above in the current period:
= 1,400 / ( 1 + 5%)
= $1,333
NPV is:
= 1,333 - 1,000 cost
= $333
B. If the amount produced increases by 1%, you should use the Gordon Growth Model:
<em>= Next payoff / ( Interest - Growth)</em>
=70/ ( 5% - 1%)
= $1,750
Take this to current year:
= 1,750 / 1.05
= $1,667
NPV will be:
= 1,667 - 1,000
= $667
Find out more about NPV at brainly.com/question/7254007.
If the U.S. government was concerned that the depreciating value of the US$ caused the Japanese government unstable, it would sell yen in the foreign exchange market. If successful the $/yen exchange rate would decline.
Explanation:
Yen that would increase market yen supply and market dollar demand, which would stabilise the dollar price. $/yen means the number of dollars for yen that may be purchased.
This value will decline as the dollar begins to appreciate.
The average Nikkei 225 fell by 7.2 percent relative to its April point at 14 May. And, in April, the yen increased to 109-110 from 112-113 to the dollar. The fall of the stock market did not cause the yen to rise for the first time. As the following chart shows, Japan's stock market downturn has been strongly influenced since 2004 by a high yen as a result of the increase in stock prices.
The thing which usually happens during tight money periods, generally is:
- short-term rates are higher than long-term rates.
<h3>What is a Tight Money Period?</h3>
This refers to an economic policy in which there is the need for control of inflation in the economy by the financial institution in a country.
With this in mind, we can see that when this happens in the tight money periods, there is usually short term rates which are higher than long term rates because there is a need to control the economy which is rising too quickly.
Read more about inflation here:
brainly.com/question/1082634
