Answer:
$ 226.04
Explanation:
Given:
Paying fund, FV = $ 30000
Interest rate, i = 2%
Time, t = 10 years
Now,
![\textup{PMT}=\textup{FV}[\frac{i}{(1+i)^n-1}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctextup%7BPMT%7D%3D%5Ctextup%7BFV%7D%5B%5Cfrac%7Bi%7D%7B%281%2Bi%29%5En-1%7D%5D)
since, the payment is made monthly
thus,
n = 10 × 12 = 120 months
i = 2% / 12 = 0.02 / 12
on substituting the values in the above equation, we get
![PMT={30000}[\frac{\frac{0.02}{12}}{(1+{\frac{0.02}{12}})^{120}-1}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=PMT%3D%7B30000%7D%5B%5Cfrac%7B%5Cfrac%7B0.02%7D%7B12%7D%7D%7B%281%2B%7B%5Cfrac%7B0.02%7D%7B12%7D%7D%29%5E%7B120%7D-1%7D%5D)
or
PMT = $ 226.04
Answer:
nepal
Explanation:
reason for export: to sell the product in different places
<span>Year Cash Flow
0 -$46,400
1 18,000
2 33,530
3 4,600</span>
<span>NPV = -$46,400 + $18,000 / (1 + 0.09) + $33,530 / (1 + 0.09)2 + $4,600 / (1 + 0.09)3 =
</span><span>-$1,574.41</span>
True
Because having inventories would mean the following:
1. Holding Inventory avoids loss of sales
2. Holding Inventory gains quantity discount
3. Holding Inventory reduces order cost 4. Achieve efficient production runs by holding inventory
5. Holding Inventory reduces risk of production shortages
Option B
Brian could be considered frictionally unemployed.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
Workers dropping their jobs or fresh workers enrolling the workforce both append to frictional unemployment. Frictional unemployment usually transpires even in a developing, solid economy. The frictional unemployment rate is determined by dealing with the workers actively seeing jobs by the total labor force.
Frictional unemployment is advantageous to an economy since it's a sign that individuals are attempting more desirable states. Frictional unemployment can be conquered by suddenly rivaling proposed job seekers with job opportunities. Frictional unemployment isn't devastating to economics.
