This question is missing the answer choices. I have found them online. They are the following:
1. Creativity is limitless and never-ending.
2. Only those who take risks can be creative.
3. In order to be creative, you must be reckless.
4. There is a time limit on our creativity.
Answer:
The statement which is best supported by the quotations is:
1. Creativity is limitless and never-ending.
Explanation:
Both Maya Angelou and Kurt Vonnegut were famous authors. Angelou was a civil-rights activist and poet born in Missouri in 1928. Vonnegut was born in Indiana in 1922, and his stories famously used satire and postmodern elements.
<u>Even though the two quotes sound very different, they are both describing creativity as limitless. Angelou says it in a more direct way: the more we use creativity, the more we have it. It is never-ending. Vonnegut, on the other hand, uses a metaphor to say the same thing. If creativity is like jumping off a cliff, we must keep on doing it over and over again. Creativity is not something you use or do only once. It is continuous. For those reasons, the best option seems to be number 1. Creativity is limitless and never-ending.</u>
NOTE: The question asks for only one statement. However, in case more than one option can be chosen, number 2 could also be checked.
The statement that best describes the relationship between the evidence in the two excerpts is:
- C The Just Mercy excerpt shows that funding for criminal justice systems is ineffective, while the “Wrongful Convictions” excerpt says the funding is necessary.
<h3>What is the relationship between the texts?</h3>
While the first text explains the parts of the criminal justice system that requires funding, the second excerpt shows that this criminal justice system was receiving a lot of unnecessary funding.
The first excerpt did not discuss the funding in a negative light.
Learn more about the criminal justice system here:
brainly.com/question/7207817
#SPJ1
After Boo, as a kid, committed an act of violence the Radleys just kind of shut him up in the house and basically kept him as a prisoner for the rest of his growing up. The town of Maycomb was as much curious about the family as they were suspicious.
You should be talking about a Rebuttal which is <span>a refutation or contradiction to your own information. Which is used in a persuasive or formal essay to make your argument more solid, and concrete.
Here is a link if you need more information.
http://education.seattlepi.com/write-rebuttal-essay-2130.html
Hope this helps! Please let me know if I am right or wrong
</span>
<span>The narrator is, of course, unreliable. He interprets the look on her face as meaning that she has finally given herself totally to him, and to preserve that moment, he freezes it by killing her. His insistence that she felt no pain is the most obvious evidence of his unreliability. The speaker is insane. The poem is primarily about his insanity--dramatic monologues are always about characterizing the speaker.</span>
