Standard deviation = $300, expected return = $5,000 has the least amout of risk.
If preserving capital is important to you, there are many options to consider when it comes to bonds and bond mutual funds. Low risk means low return, but many people, such as retirees and those who need access to savings for specific short-term needs, want some return to sleep at night. I think it's okay to withhold.
With that in mind, here are the eight leading options in Rector, the low-risk segment of the fixed income market. They don't offer exceptional yields, but that's not the point.
Learn more about risk here:
brainly.com/question/25567167
#SPJ4
Answer:
Statistical Section
Explanation:
The statistical section of comprehensive annual financial report contains details of most of PESTLE factors in numeric terms that shows to what extent these things will either affect or help the organization in near future.
Answer:
Output/Input (APEX) <--------
Explanation:
This is the <u>CORRECT</u> answer for APEX.
Answer:
![P(E1)=\frac{20}{50}=0.4](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28E1%29%3D%5Cfrac%7B20%7D%7B50%7D%3D0.4)
![P(E2)=\frac{13}{50}=0.26](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28E2%29%3D%5Cfrac%7B13%7D%7B50%7D%3D0.26)
![P(E3)=\frac{13}{50}=0.34](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28E3%29%3D%5Cfrac%7B13%7D%7B50%7D%3D0.34)
I used the relative frequency method
Explanation:
To solve this question we can use the relative frequency to find out each probability. The relative frequency is the ratio of the occurrence of each event and the total number of outcomes.
Here the experiment has been repeated 50 times, so that is the total number of outcomes and the denominator. There are 3 possible events E1, E2, and E3, so we can calculate the ratios to get the probabilities
Event E1 occurred 20 times of the 50: ![P(E1)=\frac{20}{50}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28E1%29%3D%5Cfrac%7B20%7D%7B50%7D)
Event E2 occurred 13 times of the 50: ![P(E2)=\frac{13}{50}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28E2%29%3D%5Cfrac%7B13%7D%7B50%7D)
Event E3 occurred 17 times of the 50: ![P(E3)=\frac{17}{50}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28E3%29%3D%5Cfrac%7B17%7D%7B50%7D)
Answer:
a. $700,000
b. 6/7 or 85.7%
c. No they will not.
Explanation:
a. Jacobs will earn the normal salary that the other designers in the other companies are getting in addition to the incremental income he brings to the company as a result of his talents.
Incremental income = Revenue with Jacobs - Revenue without Jacobs
= 1,000,000 - 400,000
= $600,000
Jacobs earnings = Normal designer earnings + incremental income
= 100,000 + 600,000
= $700,000
b. Economic rent is the excess amount that the company is paying Jacobs over what it should normally cost to get a designer.
Normal cost of designer is $100,000. Company is therefore paying an economic rent of $600,000.
Proportion of Jacobs salary that is economic rent = ![\frac{Economic rent}{Jacobs annual earning}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7BEconomic%20rent%7D%7BJacobs%20annual%20earning%7D)
= ![\frac{600,000}{700,000}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B600%2C000%7D%7B700%2C000%7D)
= 6/7 or 85.7%
c. The company hiring Jacobs will not be making an economic profit because for them to make an economic profit they would have to be making more than the $400,000 that the other firms make. They cannot make this amount because for them to do so they would have to reduce the amount they pay Jacobs. If they do so, Jacobs would leave for greener pastures and then they would be making the same $400,000 that the rest are making.