Answer:
True true false False true false I'm not sure this is correct
Explanation:
Answer:
Option C Incorrect; adjusting for price changes, his salary is less than his dad's salary
Explanation:
Adjustment to price changes = (Amount received n years ago divided by Price Index n years ago) * Price Index today
Adjustment To price changes = ($28,000 / 110.8) * 180.5 = $45613.7
The amount $28,000 is worth $45,613.7 in todays value which means that if we adjust for price changes, Dave is incorrect because his salary is worth less by an amount $613.7 from his father's salary.
Answer:
1. Ending Carrying value value in 2016 = legal cost for application which is $20,000
Ending Carrying value in 2017 = legal cost of application in 2016 + legal fees incurred in 2017 = $20,00 + $8000= $28,000
2. The company should not amortize the trade as it was not impaired in 2016 and 2017.
The trade name can be amortized if it's useful life is known above which the company has determined that it will not use the trade name anymore, then it will be amortized over it's useful life.
Market for new issues of securities is Primary Market and Market for already-existing securities is Secondary Market.
What is Secondary Market?
Investors can acquire and sell securities they already possess on the secondary market. Although stocks are also sold on the main market when they are originally issued, it is what most people refer to as the "stock market."
Therefore,
Market for new issues of securities is Primary Market and Market for already-existing securities is Secondary Market.
To learn more about Secondary Market from the given link:
brainly.com/question/17168396
#SPJ4
Answer:
the answer is option D)<u>Equal sharing of the bill ensures that people order a similar dollar amount of food</u>
Explanation:
The theory of consumer behavior states that "consumers allocate incomes among different goods and services to maximize their utility"
Consumer behavior revolves around three parameters their preferences, budget constraints, and options available.
The budget constraint will definitely influence the choice of what to buy within the options available to maximize utility. That means how the bill is shared among the three friends will ultimately affect how much they will chose to eat.
Secondly, The vegetarian will not be better off with equal sharing of the bill because the cost of his food according to the data provided is less.
We don not know for sure if the wine drinker drinks too much or whether he will want his other friends to foot the extra bill from the cost of his wine but we are certain that equal sharing of the bill ensures that people order a similar dollar amount of food.