Answer:
Explanation:
a). The highest point of the house was hurt. It will be made sure about under Part A . The most outrageous proportion of game plan is $120,000. The cash estimation of hardship is $10,000. In this manner, the dollar whole receivable for adversity is $10,000.
b). The damage of window of the parlor will be made sure about under Part A course of action. The cash estimation of the damages is $400. From this time forward, the dollar proportion of mishap payable is $400.
c). The damages on account of impact of water radiator will be made sure about under Part C, singular property hurt. The most outrageous proportion of hardship will be half of inclusion A. The most extraordinary proportion of consideration will be $60,000 (half of $120,000). In any case, the genuine cash estimation of the incident is $2,000. In this way, the dollar proportion of setback will be $2,000
Answer:
Cost of goods manufactured= $3,120
COGS= $2,750
Explanation:
<u>To calculate the cost of goods manufactured, we need to use the following formula:</u>
cost of goods manufactured= beginning WIP + direct materials + direct labor + allocated manufacturing overhead - Ending WIP
Cost of goods manufactured:
beginning WIP= 0
direct materials= 2,200
Direct labor= 1,000
Factory overhead= 520
Ending work in process= 600
Cost of goods manufactured= $3,120
<u>Now, we can determine the cost of goods manufactured:</u>
COGS= beginning finished inventory + cost of goods manufactured - ending finished inventory
COGS= 0 + 3,120 - 370
COGS= $2,750
Answer:
According to studies of human decision-making, the most likely is:
c. After reading the article, all members of the group oppose capital punishment.
Explanation:
The article, provided for reading by supporters and opposers, will likely sway the 40% of the group, who are initially supportive of capital punishment, to now oppose capital punishment,especially if the article critically opposes capital punishment. There is no way majority of the group will support capital punishment. Therefore, options a and b are incorrect. For option d, after reading the article, the opinions of some opposers and supporters may shift either way. They will not remain the same as before. This rules out option d, leaving only option c as the correct option.
Answer: ($24100)
Explanation:
The annual financial advantage (disadvantage) for the company goes thus:
The relevant cost to produce will be:
= ($4.10 × 19,000) + ($8.70 × 19,000) + ($9.20 × 19,000) + ($4.60 × 19,000) + $31,000
= $77900 + $165300 + $174800 + $87400 + $31000
= $536,400
The relevant costs to buy will be:
= 19,000 × $29.5
= $560,500
Since the relevant cost to buy is more than the relevant cost to produce, then the financial disadvantage will be:
= $560500 - $536,400
= $24,100
The answer is ($24,100)
