All categories

3 years ago

Pam and Ralph work at a factory with a labor union. Pam and Ralph may have to

Business

2 answers:

ANTONII [103]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

a) trust another person to negotiate their wages

Explanation:

N76 [4]3 years ago

6 0

Answer: have their wages garnished to avoid unemployment

Explanation:

Pam and Ralph must garnished their wages too avoid unemployment in future. This is because they have to decide the actual pay per day or monthly to avoid any kind of discrimination with their employers. They must also negotiate with their employers for payment to avoid unemployment due to high pay. They should not trust others for the negotiation with others. They can attend training for a work but it should be paid according to the labor standards and it should not include overtime.

You might be interested in

Like a good economist, you calculated the opportunity cost of getting your college degree. suppose that at your university, you

VikaD [51]

Opportunity cost of going to college is actually the salary forgone.
With a yearly salary of $15,000 and a rent of $12000 yearly (parents would not let you live at home), we are left with $15000 - $12000 = $3000 per year
For 4 years, the opportunity cost will be 4 x $3000 = $12000

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

PLEASE HELP!

kiruha [24]

Answer:

Consumers should not buy from companies that don't source materials

Explanation:

Companies should never have an excuse for not sourcing for their materials responsively and responsibly. They owe an ethical responsibility as well as a duty to offer their customers qualitative products at the best price and that is most sustainable to the environment.In recent times, through the widespread use of social media and the instrument of investigative journalism, it has been able to bring to the surface, the less than responsible activities of many companies in sourcing for their interest of the public and the environment.The 2006 movie "Blood Diamond" shows an avid description of how diamonds are mined and traded in the war-torn country of Sierra Leonne depicting the violation of Human and Child rights and how is excessively enriched diamond suppliers and companies.It is clear that many companies despite the public outcry for transparency in revealing their supply chain in sourcing for their materials still chose unorthodox practices. It therefore, falls on the consumers to spend their money responsibly and make smart and credible choices with their finances by refusing to buy from companies that are not transparent with their source materials.Consumers are the life-wire of any business and the hope of any business survival rests majorly on consumer satisfaction. Researches have shown that companies are no being accountable with the natural resources are utilized and have been used to cause serious harm to people and the environment. Since the companies manage to evade adequate regulations and responsibilities, it falls on the consumers to ensure that their money serves them to the greatest value.

8 0

3 years ago

You purchased 1,000 shares of stock in Natural Chicken Wings, Inc., at a price of $43.37 per share. Since you purchased the stoc

leonid [27]

Answer:

9.68%

Explanation:

Percent Return on Investment is calculated as Net Profit / Cost of Investment x 100

Net Profit= $46,620 (1,000 x $46.62 per share) + $950 (1,000 x $.95 per share) - $43,370 (1,000 x $43.37 per share) = $4,200

Cost of Investment= $43,370 (1,000 x $43.37 per share)

Percent Return on Investment= $4,200 / $43,370 x 100 = 9.68%

4 0

2 years ago

Suppose that the price of sushi take-out, a substitute, decreases in price. what will happen to the demand for chinese take-out?

omeli [17]

Suppose that the price of sushi take-out, a substitute, decreases in price. What will happen to the demand for Chinese take-out? The demand for Chinese take-out will likely decrease as a substitute is cheaper. Those we are okay with substituting one item with another are often after the price the items sell out versus exactly what the want from the item. Since they are substitutes, more people will likely get the cheaper option, Sushi take-out.

8 0

3 years ago

Discuss the 3 types of bailments and identify the legal ramifications regarding possession or acquisition and treatment of the b

ra1l [238]

Answer:

Three types of bailments are:

1) Bailment that benefits both the bailor and the bailee.

2) Bailment that benefits only the bailor.

3) Bailment that benefits only the bailee.

Explanation:

Bailment can be understood as a temporary transfer of the property from one person to another for a given specific time period and also for some specific purpose. There is a difference between bailment and the sale, as in the former the ownership of the property is not transferred. The owner of the property who delivers the property to another person is called bailor, whereas, the person who temporarily receives the property is called bailee.

There are basically three types of bailment:

1) Bailment that benefits both the bailor and the bailee: In this case, both the party benefits in the bailment process. The most suitable example is renting a house for another person for a living. Here, the bailor is benefited as he receives the renting fee and the bailee gets the house for living.

2) Bailment that benefits only the bailor: In this only, the bailor is benefited in the bailment process. The best example is the free car parking service by a valet. The bailor is benefited as he gets the car parking service, but as the service is free, the bailee does not receive any benefit out of it, However, the damage to the car might incur certain liability on the hands of the bailee.

3) Bailment that benefits only the bailee: In this bailment procedure, only the bailee is the one who receives the benefits. The most appropriate example of this is the library system. In the library, the person who borrows the book is the bailee and receives the benefit in the form of a book, whereas, the bailor (library) does not benefit anything out of it.

Some legal ramifications related to the possession and acquisition of the bailment:

If the bailment term is over, then the bailor has the right to reclaim the property from the bailee and bailee has to return it to the bailor. However, if the term is over after a certain fixed period of time and the bailor has not claimed for the property, then the bailee can address the property as abandoned to the bailor.

In other cases, if the bailor has not reclaimed the property or did not make any attempt to do so, and the fixed duration has passed, then in such case, the bailee can claim the property as its own. However, to stay in good faith, the bailee should show the bailor that the property has been abandoned.

7 0

2 years ago