The constitutional principle that worked during the estimation of the 2010 Census is referred to as reapportionment.
<h3>Which constitutional principle worked in the 2010 Census?</h3>
- In 2010, there was a census held in the United States that was widely participated in.
- The result of the census was determined through reapportionment.
- In conducting the decennial census, the seats of the U.S. House of Representatives were reapportioned.
- The seats of the legislative body are distributed among administrative units and subdivisions.
- This had a direct impact on the elections conducted in 2012.
- Therefore, reapportionment was a constitutional principle operative in the 2010 decennial census.
- Article two of the US Constitution explains the nature, scope, and features of reapportionment.
Therefore, the constitutional principle that worked during the estimation of the 2010 Census is referred to as reapportionment.
Learn more about the 2010 United States Census here: brainly.com/question/3217491
#SPJ2
The stamp act, Virginia resolves, magna carta and petition of rights, Declatory Act, Townsend Duties
Thats all I know .. I think
Answer:
The communist manifesto is a book about the communism and socialism, written in the late 1890's by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engals.
The book extensively describe the exploitation done by the capitalist market system and introduces a new political and economic system that diminish the class differences between the rich and the poor.
Also, the book provides an analytical critique of the capitalism and the harsh way it treats the economically under privileged people, while predicting its downfall.
Explanation:
Answer:
The absence of armed fight against the mother country (Spain and Portugal), and the result of each independence.
Explanation:
The main characteristic of the independence movements of the Spanish colonies is that in almost all there was a war between the colonists and colonizers that dragged on for some years and ended with the victory of the colonists. It was like that in Chile, Uruguay, Argentina, and Bolivia. In Brazil, <u><em>there were several conflicts during the Independence process, but none directly influenced the Declaration of Independence.</em></u>
The main difference between the Independence movements of Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile is the result achieved by each country. In Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay, declarations of Independence took these countries directly to the republican regime, while <u><em>in Brazil there was only a political break with the metropolis maintaining the entire system that was in force during the colony.</em></u>
Thomas Hobbes thought that all humans were naturally selfish and greedy, and needed the power of an absolute ruler to hold them back. He thought that the people should obey the rulers every word. Locke said that a true government was meant to protect all natural rights of a person, and that the people had to have a voice in government. He was against the monarchy, because he believed that it was not protecting the natural rights of the people, and reversely, going against them.
