Answer: The British Mandate over PALESTINE
Explanation/context:
The mandate system authorized a member nation of the League of Nations to govern a former German or Turkish colonial area after the conclusion of World War I.
There were mandate territories for former German territories in Africa and Asia, as well for former Ottoman territories in the Middle East.
The former Turkish provinces of Syria, Iraq and Palestine in the Middle East were divided into a French mandate territory and British mandate territory. The British mandate rule over Palestine proved very problematic for the British to govern, as tension grew between local Arab populations and a strong influx of Jewish immigrants trying to reestablish themselves in the region. The British Mandate period in Palestine has much to do with the history of the development of the Arab-Israeli conflict.
The statements that best describe Schenck v. United States was that The case upheld the conviction of Eugene V. Debs for giving an antiwar speech and also the case upheld the constitutionality of the wartime Espionage Act.
- Schenck v. United States.was known to be a legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court that has its ruling on March 3, 1919. It was center on the freedom of speech protection placed in the U.S. Constitution.
- The case was that the stand on the constitutionality of the wartime Espionage Act still remains.
Conclusively, we can say that the Schenck v. United States ruling was that case upheld the constitutionality of the wartime Espionage Act
Learn more from
brainly.com/question/9071432
Answer:
Today, more people than ever live in a country other than the one in which they were born. According to the IOM World Migration Report 2020, as of June 2019 the number of international migrants was estimated to be almost 272 million globally, 51 million more than in 2010. Nearly two thirds were labour migrants.
Explanation: