The delegates who attended the Constitutional Convention were considered "stars" of America at the time because they were deputized or choses by the different legislators of their respective states. They were among the most revered members of society who were professionals - they were physicians, lawyers, educators, financiers, among others. They were also considered as "stars" because they helped produce the constitution of America - they were the best among the best.
A scientific argument is when it had more examples of that certain argument. What I’m saying is that scientific arguments have more details and more evidence to why that answer is wrong or right. Regular arguments is when it is less detailed and just making predictions and theoretical analysis. (Hope this helps)
I believe that would be the fault line.
Hope it helps!
The sentence that President Johnson used is: "We are met here tonight as Americans...not as Democrats or as Republicans, we are met here as Americans to solve that problem".
<h3>Special Message to the Congress: The American Promise</h3>
The speech captioned above was delivered on the 15th of March, 1965.
At the beginning of the paragraph, President Lyndon Baines Johnson stated that the problem the country had was not a North or Southern problem, neither was it a racial problem, but an American problem.
One could say that the goal of that speech was to further reduce or eliminate the lines that divided America.
Please see the link below for more about The American Promise:
brainly.com/question/10598772
Joseph Stalin was a strong, ambitious, brutal, and practical state-man, a man of action and politics. Stalin, born under the name of Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili, of Georgian and poor origin, was raised as a street boy by a drunken and violent father. He forged a strong character and a corpulent body, without a very persuasive speech, although a very clever mind. He was patient and reflexive, very smart for politics. Stalin wanted very well trained and disciplined revolutionary professionals, a body of bureaucrats for the Soviet Union.
Lev Trotsky was totally the opposite. Born under the name of Lev Davidovich Bronstein, son of wealthy landowner Jewish parents, he developed a distinguished and very well educated character, he was elegant, but also fanatic enough to lead the masses. Unlike Stalin, he was not only a politician but also a Marxist intellectual and was less methodic and patient than Stalin. Trotsky wanted a not very well organized party of masses and the triumph of the permanent revolution. He wanted to export the revolution worldwide and not keep it limited to one country only.
Vladimir Lenin, born under the name of Vladimir Ilich Ulianov, was in the middle between both characters. He was the basis of the Russian Revolution. He had brilliant political intelligence and ambition, and he was a Marxist intellectual as well. After his death in 1924, the movement was divided between Trotsky and Stalin, and finally, the Soviet Union was lead by Stalin who sent Trotsky to exile. Trotsky died in 1949, killed by spies sent by Stalin to Mexico, where Trotsky was exiled.
