Year Annual cost PV factor at 12% Present value
1 $1,800,000 0.893 $1.607,400
2 $1,800,000 0.797 $1,434,600
3 $1,800,000 0.712 $1,281,600
4 $1,800,000 0.636 $1,144,800
5 $1,770,000 0.567 $1,003,590
6 $1,740,000 0.507 $882,180
7 $1,710,000 0.452 $772,920
8 $1,680,000 0.404 $678,720
9 $1,650,000 0.361 $595,650
10 $1,620,000 0.322 $521,640
Present worth $9,923,100
Answer:
Contribution per unit of scare resource (in hour) = $24 per hour
Explanation:
The question falls under the limiting factor analysis
<em>When a business is faced with a problem of shortage of a resource which can be used to produced more than one product type, to maximize the use of the resource , the business should allocate it for production purpose in such a way that </em><em>it maximizes the contribution per unit of the scare resource.</em>
Therefore Santario Company should allocate the machine hours to maximize the contribution per unit of machine hour.
Contribution per unit of scare resource is determine as follows:
Contribution per unit of scare resource for Model K-3
Contribution per unit of Model K-3 = $6
Machine time per unit = 15 minutes
<em>Contribution per unit of scare resource in minutes</em>
=Contribution per unit/Machine time per unit
= 46/15 minutes
= $0.4 per minute
Contribution per unit of scare resource (in hour)
$0.4 per minutes× 60
= $24 per hour
The best answer for this question would be:
<span>b. domestic producers of jet skis are worse off, domestic consumers of jet skis are better off, and the economic well-being of the country rises.
Because originally the jet skis came from the country they originated from so the quality is original and more trusted to the consumers. </span>
Answer: c. capital loss.
Explanation:
A capital loss refers to a scenario where the price of a security falls below the price at which it was purchased. This is what happened to the Alpha Industries stock above as the price dropped from $39 to $37 which led to a capital loss of $2.
The dividends paid seem to outweigh the capital loss but we cannot be certain of this unless we know the tax rate being applied to the dividends and because these are usually high, the after tax dividends might have been lower the capital loss of $2.
A firm that produces units of output using capital and labor to determine its total costs will decline by doing so, the firm will evaluate its:<u> Marginal cost Function .</u>
<u></u>
Option C is correct .
Marginal cost is the change in cost due to producing on excess unit of affair. To determine how big its total cost decline, the establishment will estimate its marginal cost function.
<h3>
Marginal cost function :</h3>
Marginal cost represents the gradual costs incurred when producing fresh units of a good or service. It's figured by taking the total change in the cost of producing further goods and dividing that by the change in the number of goods produced.Marginal cost is calculated as the aggregate charges needed to manufacture one fresh good. thus, it can be measured by changes to what charges are incurred for any given fresh unit.<u> Marginal Cost</u><u> = Change in</u><u> Total Charges ÷</u><u> Change in volume of Units Produced.</u>
Question is incomplete ,missing option is given below :
Consider a firm that produces units of output using capital and labor. Due to changes in market conditions, it has decided to reduce its daily output from 5 units to 4 units. To determine how much its total costs will decline by doing so, the firm will evaluate its: Group of answer choices
A.marginal product function
B.average product function
C.marginal cost function
D.average total cost function
E.average variable cost function
Learn more about Marginal cost function :
brainly.com/question/17481520
#SPJ4
