Answer:
I d k I don't know got it? sorry
Answer:
you change lanes
Explanation:
it provides safety to the enforcement and who ever there with
Two examples of real-life instances where a person might engage in an error in reasoning and, as a result, come to a faulty conclusion about something that they observed are:
1. Concluding that a person is harsh because his face is not cheerful.
2. Predicting that it will rain because the weather is gloomy.
<h3>What is a Faulty Conclusion?</h3>
A faulty conclusion is reached when the pattern of reasoning is faulty. Before a conclusion can be reached on a matter, it is vital to test the observations beyond all reasonable doubts.
If this is not done, the probability of reaching a faulty conclusion will be high.
Learn more about faulty conclusions here:
brainly.com/question/2141635
Answer:
200 million dollars.
Explanation:
The Sherman Law is an anti-trust law implemented in the year 1980 to outlaw market monopolization and anticompetitive agreements among businesses and corporations. The Sherman Antitrust Act states that corporates that violate the law would be subjected to a fine of about 100 million dollars per violations.
Therefore, if LMNOP Corp. has been convicted of two distinct and separate violations under the the Sherman Act, LMNOP may be fined as much as 200 million dollars for these two violations.
A civil case begins when a person or entity (such as a corporation or the government), called the plaintiff, claims that another person or entity (the defendant) has failed to carry out a legal duty owed to the plaintiff. Both the plaintiff and the defendant are also referred to as "parties" or "litigants." The plaintiff may ask the court to tell the defendant to fulfill the duty, or make compensation for the harm done, or both. Legal duties include respecting rights established under the Constitution or under federal or state law.
i hope this helps !!
