1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
viktelen [127]
3 years ago
9

I’m sooooooooooooooooooooo confused

Law
2 answers:
cluponka [151]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Public morals

Explanation:

Eduardwww [97]3 years ago
6 0
The answer is B. public order
You might be interested in
Don't comment if you're not filipino
sashaice [31]

Answer:

Tell them that you're in love I think they'll get it l.m.a.o

4 0
3 years ago
. Arrest or custody
Juli2301 [7.4K]

Answer:

the First one you listed. The officer has to give the Juvenile his or her Miranda Right for him or her to remain silent

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Econ may someone answer please and thank you
Vaselesa [24]

Answer:

B

Explanation: I don't know, I mean it seems sensible but i want to be a lawyer when i grow up and it looks like the disadvantage would be conflicts because say both owners decide on selling it, and owner A wants to sell it for lets say $450 and owner B wants to sell it for $750 that right there would be a conflict and could lead to in some cases a break of the contract they signed which can lead to court and all that stuff but the advantage would be that you could have many expert partners like the answer says and they could correct you on your mistakes, lets go back to the imaginary problem i made up. Owner A wants to sell the object for $450 dollars and owner B wants to sell it for $750 but Owner A is a more experienced and shows owner B that it was worth that but its been used so therefore you should lower the price and it would be easier to sell. (sorry if i sound stupid I wouldn't recommend using that as the answer but if you decide to please tell me if i'm right or wrong also I'm 12 so...)

4 0
3 years ago
Which branch of the federal has the power to appoint federal judges?
user100 [1]

Answer:

The correct answer is Executive Branch .

Explanation:

The executive branch is made up of the president, vice president, and his entire cabinet. For the appointment of a federal judge, the appointment of the President and an approval of the Senate are required considering the provisions of Article 3 of the Constitution of the United States. The duration of this appointment is indefinite, unless the judge commits a crime and must be tried for it.

3 0
3 years ago
Politics<br><br> ssssssssssssss
Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

what ??????????????????

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following statements about the partnership is TRUE? *
    7·1 answer
  • What questions do filibusters raise about the American Democracy?
    15·1 answer
  • An attorney is the managing partner at a small law firm. The attorney believes that technology will be increasingly important in
    9·1 answer
  • Seatbelts keeps the force required to stop them smaller.
    14·1 answer
  • Which statement best summarizes the relationship between investments and
    8·1 answer
  • All elements of an offense have to be proven before someone can be charged with the crime.
    13·1 answer
  • Any help with the beach movie question
    10·1 answer
  • Can you buy me a bird
    14·2 answers
  • Nikita just graduated from college and wants to go into a career with INTERPOL as law enforcement personnel. Where might she exp
    7·2 answers
  • Why are you rip offs
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!