1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
leva [86]
3 years ago
15

When evaluating whether to purchase public stock (i.e. an investor), what ratio should be considered to be most important and WH

Y
Business
1 answer:
Olenka [21]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The price earnings ratio should be considered to be most important.

The reason is that the price earnings ratio indicates how much the market is ready to pay for a stock based on its current earnings.

Explanation:

The price earnings ratio is a market prospect ratio that compares the market price per share to the earnings per share to determine the market value of a stock in relation to its earnings. The P/E ratio is calculated using the following formula:

P/E ratio = Market price per share / Earnings per share

The price earnings ratio should be considered to be most important because it indicates how much the market is ready to pay for a stock based on its current earnings. It is frequently used by investors to estimate a stock's fair market value by forecasting future earnings per share. The rationale for this is that companies with larger future earnings are more likely to pay bigger dividends or have stock that appreciates in value.

The price to earnings ratio is also known as a price multiple or earnings multiple for this reason. This is because the ratio is used by investors to determine the value of a share based on its earnings multiple. In other words, how much they are willing to pay as a multiple of their incomes.

You might be interested in
You have $106,000 to invest in a portfolio containing Stock X and Stock Y. Your goal is to create a portfolio that has an expect
Helga [31]

Answer:  ER(P) = ERX(WX) + ERY(WY)

                   16 = 13(1-WY)  + 9(WY)

                    16 = 13 - 13WY + 9WY

                    16 = 13 - 4WY

                   4WY = 13-16

                   4WY = -3

                     WY = -3/4

                     WY = -0.75

                     WX = 1 - WY

                     WX = 1 - (-0.75)

                     WX = 1 + 0.75

                     WX = 1.75

 The amount to be invested in stock Y = -0.75 x $106,000

                                                                    = -$79,500

The Beta of the portfolio could be calculated using the formula:

                     BP = BX(WX) + BY(WY)

                     BP = 1.14(1.75) + 0.84(-0.75)

                     BP = 1.995 - 0.63

                     BP = 1.365

Explanation: The expected return of the portfolio is equal to expected return of stock X multiplied by the weight of stock X plus the expected return of stock Y multiplied by weight of security Y. The weight of security Y is -0.75. The weight of security X is equal to 1 - weight of security Y. Thus, the weight of security X is 1.75 since the weight of security Y is negative. The amount to be invested in security Y is -0.75 x $106,000, which is equal to -$79,500

The Beta of the portfolio equals Beta of stock X multiplied by weight of stock X plus the Beta of stock Y multiplied by weight of stock Y. The weights of the two stocks have been obtained earlier. Therefore, the Beta of the portfolio is 1.365.

6 0
3 years ago
During the current year, Morgan, Inc., had net income of $657,000. Morgan also recorded $203,000 in deprecation expense and had
Paraphin [41]

Answer:

$823,000

Explanation:

To determine the net cash provided by operating activities using the indirect method we can use the following formula:

net cash flow = net income + depreciation expense - accounts receivable increase + inventory decrease - accounts payable decrease

net cash flow = $657,000 + $203,000 - $28,000 + $12,000 - $21,000 = $823,000

If accounts receivable decreased, then it would be added.

If inventories increased, then it would be subtracted.

If accounts payable increased, then it would be added.

6 0
3 years ago
Tolino Company signed a 5-year note payable on January 1, 2019, of $200,000. The note requires annual principal payments each De
konstantin123 [22]

The following journal entry will be passed in the books of accounts and the interest expense is calculated to an amount of $9600

<u>Explanation:</u>

Given data:

amount of note: $200000, annual principal payments to be made each year at December 31st = $40000, interest amount to be charged = 6 percent, duration of note = 5 years

the following calculation is made in order to find out the amount of interest:

Amount of note minus principal payment multiply with rate of interest

now, putting the figures in formula:

interest = 200000 minus 40000 = $160000 multiply with .06 = $9600

Thus, the interest amount = $9600

The interest expense will be debited with an amount of $9600 in the books of accounts.

8 0
3 years ago
1. Ira Schwab opens up a Schwab IRA and places $2,000 in his retirement account at the beginning of each year for 10 years. He b
s2008m [1.1K]

Answer:

He will have $102,979 in his retirement account in 10 years.

Explanation:

Annual Payment = $2,000

Number of Year = n = 10

Interest rate = i = 5%

Compounded Quarterly

Future value after 10 years

FV = A [ ( ( 1 + ( r / m )^mt ) - 1 / ( r / m )

FV = $2,000 [ ( ( 1 + ( 0.05 / 4 )^40 ) - 1 / ( 0.05 / 4 )

Future value = $102,979

So, Ira Schwab will have $102,979 in his retirement account in 10 years.

5 0
3 years ago
Suppose two cities are considering tearing down their stadiums to build new ones. In one city, the old stadium cost $5 million t
timofeeve [1]

Answer:

These are the options for the question:

A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.

B. They should be more willing to tear down the $50 million stadium, because it cost more to build.

C. The cost to build the old stadium shouldn’t be considered.

And this is the correct answer:

A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.

Explanation:

City A will likely be more willing to tear down its old stadium because it costed $5 million to build. City B, on the other hand, will have to think twice because a stadium that costed $50 billion to build could have more value than it seems, or the City could simply not have enough money to build a better new stadium (something that would probably cost more than $50 billion to do).

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • if consumers to demand in a quantity of 100 at $4 per item and the suppliers Supply 200 of the item at $4 than a surplus is crea
    10·1 answer
  • Kennedy Enterprises has budgeted sales for the months of September and October at $ 110 comma 000 and $ 170 comma 000​, respecti
    15·1 answer
  • 3x5=?<br><br> IRMAĞININ AKIŞINA ÖLÜRÜM TÜRKİYEM
    6·1 answer
  • A period of economic stability began in the 1980s. In 2001, prices began to increase. In 2007, an economic crisis caused prices
    8·2 answers
  • After enrolling in Medicare and purchasing a supplement, Rachel withdrew $2,000 from her HSA. She used $600 to pay her Medicare
    14·1 answer
  • Use the following information to answer the question: Cost of car: $26,000 Residual value: $6,000 Life: 5 years Using the given
    13·1 answer
  • "With a finance degree, you can apply for almost any position available to accounting majors."
    5·1 answer
  • Francois deposits $350.00 in a savings account. The account pays an annual interest rate of 4.3%. He makes no other deposits or
    8·1 answer
  • a. Long-term bonds have fewer risks than short-term bonds. b. Long-term bonds have more risks associated with them, and bring in
    13·1 answer
  • G Obligations to be paid within one year or the company's operating cycle, whichever is longer, are:
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!