Answer:
(This is an opinionated question so there actually is no right or wrong answer. I will put what <em>I </em>would have answered, and you can change it up it's not what you would put :] )
Explanation:
I would have chosen more peaceful tactics. Though it's true that the Soviet Union may have went against any peace treaties as they have plenty of times, it's ultimately a better option than spending all our time and money, that could be better spent on other things within our country, on stockpiling weapons. It has been useful in being a reminder to other countries not to test the U.S., but it's also cost a lot of money that could be put towards better causes.
I hope this helped :)
<span>The purpose of building the Suez Canal was to allow ships to travel between the Mediterranean and Red Seas, which would increase trade between the Middle East, Europe, and Asia.</span>
When writing these entries describing the Japanese advance across Asia and the Pacific <span>during 1941 and 1942 make sure to mention the brutality the came as a result of this movement. </span>
Answer:
d
) Patriots were more likely than Loyalists to believe in the idea of consent of the governed.
Explanation:
The first thing you would understand is that Loyalists were called Loyalists because they supported the rules of Great Britain. If they supported staying as a colony, why would they have any will in the first place to "go to war" with Great Britain if they are contend with the status they hold during the time? The only group that wanted to go to war was the Patriot group, not the Loyalist group.
A) The scientists of the Industrial Revolution discovered ways to make machines much more efficient than people.
The Revolution focused on production efficiency rather than craftsmanship and quality.
