<span>Herodotus and Thucydides take two different approaches in recording history. They are both considered fathers of their respective branches of historiography. Herodotus, although he has some interest in the facts, is mostly writing to entertain his audiences. He writes a history of the Persian Wars, but spends most of his time writing about the histories of different places involved in the story. He sensationalizes stories to make them more interesting, and changes facts in order to show a moral or lesson, and sometimes completely makes things up (like giant gold digging ants, ect.) Its unsure to what extent he consciously made these things up, or if he believed them and had just heard them from unreliable sources. There is truth to his writing, but one must consciously glean what is true from what is false, and go into his work knowing that you can't trust everything he says. </span>
A) They feared it would challenge their rights to own slaves and impose hurt tariffs.
While North Carolina agreed with the Union's views of Slavery, South Carolina did not and therefore it seceded from North Carolina and joined the rest of the South in trying to secede from the Union.
I really don't know this question but your answer should be to five sentences in length considered all the mistakes the Ming made in terms of trading and outside relationship with other nations example D&B Nation Damien and Biannca
