Yeah your argument is correct.
At 18 you can vote, the present-day youth are literate and enlightened and the lowering of the voting age would provide to the unrepresented youth of the country an opportunity to give vent to their feelings and help them become a part of the political process.
It is, therefore, proposed to reduce the voting age from 21 years to 18 years. Hence, the court argument is proved as wrong. 18 have the capability to vote.
John Griffith<span> "</span>Jack<span>" </span>London<span> (born </span>John Griffith Chaney, <span>January 12, 1876 – November 22, 1916) </span><span>was an American author, journalist, and social activist.</span>
The option with the commas is the best written sentence
Answer:
yes, the answer is like, as
Answer:
They were upset at higher taxes created by Hamilton.
Explanation:
Hamilton increased the tax on Whiskey since it was alcohol and a controversial issue at the time. So through process of elimination, I got down to that answer.
