Why do we say the canadian constitution is made up of many parts???

1 answer:

8 0

The Constitution of Canada (French: Constitution du Canada) is the supreme law in Canada.[1] It outlines Canada's system of government and the civil and human rights of those who are citizens of Canada and non-citizens in Canada.[2] Its contents are an amalgamation of various codified acts, treaties between the Crown and indigenous peoples (both historical and modern), uncodified traditions and conventions. Canada is one of the oldest constitutional monarchies in the world.[3]

According to subsection 52(2) of the Constitution Act, 1982, the Canadian Constitution consists of the Canada Act 1982 (which includes the Constitution Act, 1982), acts and orders referred to in its schedule (including in particular the Constitution Act, 1867, formerly the British North America Act, 1867), and any amendments to these documents.[4] The Supreme Court of Canada has held that the list is not exhaustive and also includes a number of pre-confederation acts and unwritten components as well.[5] See list of Canadian constitutional documents for details

You might be interested in

Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.

olya-2409 [2.1K]

Answer:

Limited governments have legal restrictions imposed on their powers. Examples of these governments include the United Kingdom and Germany. The citizens of these countries enjoy basic rights such as freedom of speech and the press. However, unconfined governments don’t face any legal restrictions on their powers. As a result, the citizens of these governments often experience human rights violations.

6 0

3 years ago

PLZ HELP ASAP True or false: More than 95% of all cases end in a plea bargain, so the trial process is a

Arlecino [84]

Answer:

This is true

3 0

3 years ago

List the different courts in your state (Texas is my state)

Rom4ik [11]

Answer:

mines texas tooo hayyyyyyy!!!!

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why Miranda is considered one of the most important cases in the history of our legal system

san4es73 [151]

Answer:

In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Suppose a defendant is convicted at trial but believes that the judge made an error that impacted the decision. She would first

densk [106]

Initially, a defendant's case is at a trial court (Federal, State, Circuit Courts).

Then the case proceeds to the Court of Appeal before finally moving to the Supreme Court of the state or at the federal level.

But it is not true that all cases must move to the Supreme Court when the defendant appeals. The movement to the highest court requires the acceptance of the defendant's argument and the merit of each case.

Thus, the defendant's case can move from a trial court, an appeals court, and then to the supreme court.

Learn more: brainly.com/question/11640159

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers