I’m so sorry if it’s wrong but I believe it’s either between... the first option- move toward more or the 3rd option- cautiously embraced. But if I were to choose which one I think I would go with the 1st option as my answer
Answer: move toward more
Explanation: Because of nearly all composers use dissonance in their music. Without dissonance, there would be no tension and release in music and it would all be VERY boring and bland. Dissonances are nothing new at all and certainly not restricted to the 20th century; in the 14th and 15th centuries these could be quite harsh and not always resolved in the way we would expect today.
Dissonance adds expression to music and as composers' techniques became more and more sophisticated, so did the harmonic language. Dissonance can be used for musical 'colour' and to create extreme tension and drama in music.
In short, composers in the 20th (and 21st) century used dissonance for very similar reasons to composers in every other century.
According to yahoo.com
Male slaves. All they did was labor and back then aren’t considered human.
Both of their works are often about a lot of things, but I'd say they were written to, say, "boost morale" of the american people.
Answer:
<em>- Increased civil rights and liberties</em>
<em>- A constitutional democracy</em>
<em>- A national legislature</em>
hope this helps! :)
The best option from the list would be that "<span>B. economic and political problems in France," </span>sparked the French Revolution, since many people were upset with the vast amount of inequality that existed in the state due to a despotic king, although the American Revolution was hugely influential.
