Answer:
traditional; human relations; interactionist
Explanation:
Conflict exists within every organization. In this context, conflict is seen as a state of disagreement between two or more individuals (groups), which is a consequence of a discrepancy of beliefs, needs, values, etc.
There are different general views of conflict that state that the latter is not necessarily a bad thing within an organization, but instead, it could actually be necessary and even beneficial.
The following are the 3 views of conflict:
- Traditional <em>- Traditionally - as it name states - conflict is seen as a bad thing. It is negative and could be harmful for the organization and its members.</em>
- Human Relations <em>- Conflict could indeed have a negative outcome, but it is inevitable and natural and, in the majority of cases, could lead to a beneficial outcome.</em>
- Interactionist - <em>Conflict, in a balanced non-extreme recurrence, is actually necessary and beneficial in an organization.</em>
Therefore, the <u>traditional</u> view of conflict is that is negative and should be avoided while the <u>human relations</u> view is that is inevitable and natural , and the <u>interactionist view</u> is that important and neccessary.
A. Byzantine Empire, this is the answer
<span>Most claim messages are written in an indirect approach because they are just another form of human interaction but in written-form. Psychologically, it's generally more socially accepted and less physiologically shocking when bad news is delivered in an indirect form as most claims tend to be "bad news."</span>
They wantedt o bring back art Answer:
Explanation:
People from the countryside believe they can get better jobs and mpre money in the city, so they leave their countryside homes (and maybe farms) and go to the city