The major difference between a light microscope and a electron microscope would be that with the light microscope, a beam of light is used to focus the image. In an electron microscope, a beam of electrons is used to focus the image. Other notable differences would be with the light microscope, your specimens must be very thin; thin enough for light to pass through them. With the EM, you can place whole specimens that can generate 3D images. There is a much more complex specimen preparation process for the EM, where light microscope slide making is fairly simple in comparison. You can view live and wet specimens with a light microscope but you cannot with the EM because an EM requires specimens to be placed in a vacuum chamber. Lastly, the EM is very large and complex to operate, where the light microscope is somewhat portable. Hope this helps!
Answer:
Explanation: Deforestation leads to climate change. The fewer trees in environment, the more carbon emmsision there is which warms up the earth. As the earth gets warmer the glaciers and ice caps in the artic and antarctic melt which leads to more water in the ocean. Think of ice melting in a glass of water, the ice melts and turns to water creating more water.
That would be beneficial to them because they wouldn't lose as many trees to disease or insects, so they are able to sell more.
That's what I got from it at least.
Answer:
This is what we call Potential Energy and Kinetic Energy
Explanation:
If the bowler is rolling a ball, let's say 5 LBS, It should travel at normal speed.
The speed is also dependent on how the bowler throws the ball.
If they were to change the weight of the ball. It would most likely slow the ball down more, as it would be too heavy to go as fast if it was a lightweight ball.
It's like a person. The bigger and heavier they are, the slower they will move with their own consecutive speed. If they are lighter, they'll most likely go faster
Im pretty sure its <span>115 km²
Hope i helped</span>
