1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sonja [21]
3 years ago
11

Belva is cheated when she buys a car from Fast Eddie’s Car Mart. She attempts to return the car, but Eddie just laughs and tells

her to go away. Every time Belva has to make a repair on the car, she gets angry. Finally, she decides to wreck Eddie’s car to get even with him. Following him home from work one evening, Belva tries to ram his car, hoping to bend the axle or frame. Instead of bending the frame, the collision smashes Eddie’s gas tank, causes an explosion, and kills him.
Law
1 answer:
Setler [38]3 years ago
4 0

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

Belva is cheated when she buys a car from Fast Eddie’s Car Mart. She attempts to return the car, but Eddie just laughs and tells her to go away. Every time Belva has to make a repair on the car, she gets angry. Finally, she decides to wreck Eddie’s car to get even with him. Following him home from work one evening, Belva tries to ram his car, hoping to bend the axle or frame. Instead of bending the frame, the collision smashes Eddie’s gas tank, causes an explosion, and kills him.

Is Belva guilty of any degree of homicide?

Answer:

Belva is guilty of first-degree murder.

Explanation:

As we can see in the question above, Belva planned to crash Eddie's car. She premeditated this attack even though she knew it would be dangerous and that it would compromise her and his life. This causes Belva to be indicted for first-degree murder.

This is because, first-degree homicide is one in which the individual plans to attack the other and that attack results in death.

Belva planned to attack Eddie, for this reason, Belva is guilty of first-degree murder.

You might be interested in
Do you think the punishment for people who are in a position of authority (such as teachers, coaches, preachers) should be harsh
irina1246 [14]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

I think that their punishment should be harsher because they are expected to do the right thing in the positions that are given to them so if they disobey they should be punish severely because they are not above the law.

6 0
3 years ago
How did the supreme court ruling in 1954 impact segregation in america?
viktelen [127]

Answer:

Board of Education of Topeka, case in which, on May 17, 1954, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously (9–0) that racial segregation in public schools violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which prohibits the states from denying equal protection of the laws to any person within their jurisdictions.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Regional courts were set up for the united states with the
Viktor [21]

Answer:

Judiciary Act 1801

Explanation:

The judiciary act of 1801 which was overturned by the Jeffersonian republicans were part of the politically-motivated attempt made by the federalists in the U.S congress and the administration of John Adams to fill the federal courts with federalists.  Federal courts were used as political means to persecute those who criticized the actions of the federalists and a strong political opposition came into place by Thomas Jefferson, and his team helped in passing the Federal Judiciary act of 1801.  

The number of Supreme Court judges was reduced from six to five by the act and the act also created six new federal circuit courts in different region of the United States of America.  

5 0
3 years ago
Reasons for creating laws are to define _____.
Lina20 [59]

Answer:

correct procedure or behavior

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT true under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act? a. An intended recipient of an e-mail has th
IgorC [24]

Answer:

C. Internet Service Providers are not prohibited from disclosing the content of email messages to 3rd parties

Explanation:

The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) is a law. It prohibits tapping or capturing communication over wires. There are other state laws that cover legalities about wiretapping.

Consent is required to capture electronic communication. In some states dual consent is required while in others single consent is sufficient.

Dual consent means both of the communicating parties must agree, while single consent means that one one party should agree. Electronic Communication Act was an amendment to the Title Third of Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act (1968).

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A country with poor infrastructure and an undeveloped industrial base can be called a _____ country. Foreign Aid and the U.S.: S
    8·2 answers
  • When a witnesses statement is taken, what must the person taking it do?
    12·2 answers
  • 4. When you're getting ready to buy a car, think ahead and make sure to
    9·2 answers
  • 8 Why are class characteristics important in a criminal trial? O A. They directly link a suspect to a crime with a high amount o
    10·1 answer
  • Impaired drivers are one of many risks drivers on the highway transportation system. List 3 ways that a driver could be potentia
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following types of income can be self-employment income?
    12·1 answer
  • True or false commercial banks tend to keep mortgage loans in their portfolio through maturity.
    7·1 answer
  • Think about someone who has been a positive leader in your life. It can be someone you know personally, or someone you've learne
    9·1 answer
  • What is one important thing for a person with power of attorney to know?
    7·1 answer
  • Mr. Lynn, an agent for Acme Insurance, Inc. thinks that, since state laws are preempted concerning the marketing of Medicare hea
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!