1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vovangra [49]
3 years ago
8

In what ways and for what reasons did us foreign policy toward latin america change in the period 1945-1963

History
1 answer:
rusak2 [61]3 years ago
6 0

After the Spanish–American War in 1898 the United States strengthened its power in the Caribbean by annexing Puerto Rico, declaring Cuba a virtual protectorate in the Platt Amendment (1901), and manipulating Colombia into granting independence to Panama (1904), which in turn invited the United States to build.

In the years after World War II, the United States was guided generally by containment — the policy of keeping communism from spreading beyond the countries already under its influence. The policy applied to a world divided by the Cold War, a struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union.

You might be interested in
HELP FAST!!!!!! FIRST TO HELP GETS BRAINLIEST!!!!
Sholpan [36]

In 60 BC, Caesar, Crassus and Pompey formed the First Triumvirate, a political alliance that dominated Roman politics for several years. Their attempts to amass power as Poplars were opposed by the Optimates within the Roman Senate, among them Cato the Younger with the frequent support of Cicero. Caesar rose to become one of the most powerful politicians in the Roman Republic through a string of military victories in the Gallic Wars, completed by 51 BC, which greatly extended Roman territory. During this time he both invaded Britain and built a bridge across the Rhine river. These achievements and the support of his veteran army threatened to eclipse the standing of Pompey, who had realigned himself with the Senate after the death of Crassus in 53 BC. With the Gallic Wars concluded, the Senate ordered Caesar to step down from his military command and return to Rome. Leaving his command in Gaul would mean losing his immunity to criminal prosecution by his enemies; knowing this, Caesar openly defied the Senate's authority by crossing the Rubicon and marching towards Rome at the head of an army.[2] This began Caesar's civil war, which he won, leaving him in a position of near unchallenged power and influence.

6 0
3 years ago
Where did the Hyksos come from?
Maru [420]

Answer:

The Hyksos were a Semitic people who gained a foothold in Egypt c. 1782 BCE at the city of Avaris in Lower Egypt, thus initiating the era known in Egyptian history as the Second Intermediate Period

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
In a short paragraph, describe one of the following foreign policy tools
sveticcg [70]
Diplomacy is the act of dealing with other nations, usually through negotiation and discussion. Diplomacy involves meetings between political leaders, sending diplomatic messages, and making public statements about the relationship between countries. The American president, for example, often hosts leaders and chief diplomats of other nations at the White House in order to discuss a variety of issues. Most diplomacy occurs behind the scenes as officials hold secret negotiations or meet privately to discuss key issues.

Approaches to Diplomacy
States generally pursue diplomacy in one of three ways:

Unilaterally: The states acts alone, without the assistance or consent of any other state.Bilaterally: The state works in conjunction with another state.Multilaterally: The state works in conjunction with several other states.

There are pros and cons to each of these three approaches. Acting unilaterally, for example, allows a state to do what it wants without compromise, but it must also bear all the costs itself. Acting with allies, on the other hand, allows a state to maintain good relations and to share the diplomatic burden, but this often requires compromise

8 0
4 years ago
Please help anyone? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the “Moral” Diplomacy?
Scrat [10]
Moral diplomacy was a major tool for the United States to pursue its economic interests abroad.

In the end, moral diplomacy increased the U.S.'s direct military action in many countries and also greatly impacted the economy by manipulating situations in countries that were not democratic or those that held what Wilson viewed as morally corrupt values.
5 0
3 years ago
Which Statements describe factors that led to the decline and defeat of the Aztec Empire?
dalvyx [7]

Answer:

a d c

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was one reason immigrants came to American in the late 1800
    5·1 answer
  • Explain why the number of combat deaths during world war 1 was extremely high
    14·1 answer
  • Why wasn't the style of Roman temples suitable for Christian worship?
    8·2 answers
  • Which outcome was MOST LIKELY to occur after the passage of this part of the act?
    15·2 answers
  • Which battles were fought in Confederate territory? In union territory?
    11·1 answer
  • What points did Douglass use to back up his argument that enslaved
    6·1 answer
  • I need this done today whoever gets this correct gets brainliest!!! PLZZ HELPP MEE!!!<br> hurryy
    13·1 answer
  • How did the Mongol Empire impact the environment and affect the exchange of cultural ideas?
    11·1 answer
  • What nation or people took control of India from the Moguls in the late 17th century ?
    7·1 answer
  • Where do you think our modern ideas about government came<br> from?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!