The routes is 5.3 according to my work
Answer:
Option B.
Explanation:
Abolitionists were political activists that promoted the ban of slavery in the United States, while abolitionists could have been conductors (people who led the slaves along the underground railroad), not all abolitionists were conductors. The other two options are incorrect because they are the exact OPPOSITE of abolitionists. Therefore Option B is correct
Please mark as Brainliest :)
Classical writings from the Renaissance heavily influenced humanist thinkers and writers like Petrarch! Petrarch is known as the "Father of Humanism."
So, why did Abraham Lincoln gain the support of most of the antislavery forces in the US? Let me tell you: he definitely did NOT <span>cut a deal with the proslavery forces of the south that allowed them to secede. (D is wrong) And contrary to popular belief, he was willing to let slavery be in the South to keep the peace, though he didn't like it. (B is wrong) And the other candidates weren't all in favor of expanding slavery. (A is wrong)
BUT, the others had no problem with LETTING it expand. So, many of the abolitionists rallied behind Lincoln, who wanted to KEEP slavery in the South. He was the closest thing they had to an anti-slavery candidate! C is right!
Answer: </span><span>the other candidates had no problem with allowing slavery to expand to new states.</span>
